IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, please provide feedback by March 26)

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Tue, 28 March 2023 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB640C14CE45 for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NoOBQYh1U3pb for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750C1C14CE2B for <congress@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id h11so7605309lfu.8 for <congress@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1679988169; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DxiRRty7Nw+cWMc9CZOh7a0zCo+b2+IEZkDzZG3DPpk=; b=XwkVWkIBhNsuLbQmpx5b8vtqU4obdZbB02+vj8g3qD9qMvLW8z6iSnfdkz1lKgUgto CjkKnu0uOJATb5pa9VPiboaQg+/NViPCeO47K15gCQZEs1UMoRXiksvxjX4v92gqbp+Q cTwgnAdznNwSRP5b2F14RxMjKKgBdWJhC5P0hCwiVjC9tRbVGWeBHCp+LgIjFcPYlWWI aLn9ggiD7MRpm59t7zC4DHvUm4Ua2PuJcKqc6PVTvPUTNLicltato3vEVHCeqrs9XOlU M9Ezg9SJyZtlZxG/LFAstKhXUk0ShGdaj4QIAOks1sNZKVUxpJClvKTmN0uS7HO/ARRF kHHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1679988169; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DxiRRty7Nw+cWMc9CZOh7a0zCo+b2+IEZkDzZG3DPpk=; b=yFeKMJNPoBRR1X57/jY23LKG/kEcb7z5aOO0JQv9GzMJOa3YNR8OY9D2RqFhfQ9cuP xsPCqx+K22aw3xDDxd6q26UNvNqfARyg2FjsG2jcor3Mc7LRNX0L1m6PuBb4bswK7PMH Zy5h86/XIjwyxx2JKE9CDNX40eF/ZmJ7yX9mOeYTasBolH+rJXIBkIDSJef+sbE9A2uC 0RZDnVjB+U4rPQaqWt6QKTdLg8axFhxSAdmNaEJEVyshXt/293f0nwTadONu2eknc9VA ezwuYB2qagH8On92tmEATV0DX5PnbiQdsWAxjplJRUBFMO18aikcLQ3sHqHv2RxLd7VT Bk/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9d1KcIIFxQ86SVUjy/FmoISw/vR3A0eywKHaOmIubzWsaV7OvSe uFxImS5zky/7uMgKNpaN6UQex0SZPmA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZVASclvEQGHGA1EwgLTfmio7cu5TYIjR/my9Q7IiNQBKn0b/mJR6XNegc23SaC5kqd+qT13A==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:519c:0:b0:4ea:f6d7:2293 with SMTP id u28-20020ac2519c000000b004eaf6d72293mr4728265lfi.55.1679988169253; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (37-219-190-117.nat.bb.dnainternet.fi. [37.219.190.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o18-20020ac24352000000b004caf992bba9sm4939937lfl.268.2023.03.28.00.22.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:22:48 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <21e7519c-49b4-9805-11d8-b593273832ed@tenghardt.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 10:22:47 +0300
Cc: congress@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <90B8E8CC-D721-455A-AE28-79896A5634DC@gmail.com>
References: <69259b38-afb0-6e1a-8c7a-fc12746cca3a@tenghardt.net> <21e7519c-49b4-9805-11d8-b593273832ed@tenghardt.net>
To: Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/lwDv2S0yI9qy6CByAvDQGxmSyGw>
Subject: Re: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, please provide feedback by March 26)
X-BeenThere: congress@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions about the CONGestion RESponse and Signaling \(CONGRESS\) Working Group" <congress.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/congress/>
List-Post: <mailto:congress@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 07:22:51 -0000

> On 28 Mar, 2023, at 3:34 am, Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote:
> 
> The chairs have decided to name the new WG the Congestion Control Working Group (CCWG), rather than CONGRESS.
> 
> Two main reasons:
> 
> - CCWG is clear and direct -- Trying to be cute has not served us well.
> 
> - CCWG is easy to contrast with ICCRG, which may help when explaining the difference.

Makes sense to me.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email