[Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, please provide feedback by March 26)
Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> Tue, 28 March 2023 00:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Original-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC26C16B5CC for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tenghardt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PAcsZD9LNnVY for <congress@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hemio.de (mail.hemio.de [136.243.12.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 983FEC16B5AA for <congress@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 17:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from user.client.invalid (localhost [136.243.12.180]) by mail.hemio.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3B42B3 for <congress@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2023 02:34:12 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tenghardt.net; s=20170414; t=1679963653; bh=WoTaMMMqymRvjJ6n5Dabz+vtKoLRE6+HXJeVRw4PykM=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=hFKgeI1SyZIXA15DUA/x1Z8IvyPfzHRznUuNRtci/lEdCMd4JfTGhdOL7fmrYOIk1 Fk6SQj+/PZaAUUGGvDMkKPpEA8aQb0lOjxLNNHRqzIy/k9N+LpnwF50QnNSOOsQDGZ V105yBtowSqtbToUIs5ICR3YKUrKh0QoQSdTjvWFKXJ2IBqy9hgA5UETMP7deNPxfW E8WzdR8E6rtzVFUb4k7SsRZjWrfEHLiUewdaFCkXQxVaM4+5EDmovFrDpi6cVn5D0R BsVUApivHh/UKsFcjln0VDOOf75E0evP6CJWp/57y4I1eZ6dg1d0gl6FoC1yFq2dyv tK0sDx3QXZ23w==
Message-ID: <21e7519c-49b4-9805-11d8-b593273832ed@tenghardt.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 09:34:08 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: congress@ietf.org
References: <69259b38-afb0-6e1a-8c7a-fc12746cca3a@tenghardt.net>
From: Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
In-Reply-To: <69259b38-afb0-6e1a-8c7a-fc12746cca3a@tenghardt.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/rHNowIkEJt8SZy4PkUYzAt2c0nw>
Subject: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, please provide feedback by March 26)
X-BeenThere: congress@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions about the CONGestion RESponse and Signaling \(CONGRESS\) Working Group" <congress.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/congress/>
List-Post: <mailto:congress@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:34:20 -0000
Dear all, The chairs have decided to name the new WG the Congestion Control Working Group (CCWG), rather than CONGRESS. Two main reasons: - CCWG is clear and direct -- Trying to be cute has not served us well. - CCWG is easy to contrast with ICCRG, which may help when explaining the difference. We will get a new mailing list and (if I understand correctly) migrate all subscribers as well as the mailing list archive. Best, Reese
- [Congress] WG name, please provide feedback by Ma… Reese Enghardt
- [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, please… Reese Enghardt
- Re: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, pl… Jonathan Morton
- Re: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, pl… Matt Mathis
- Re: [Congress] New WG name: CCWG (Re: WG name, pl… Reese Enghardt