[Congress] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-congress-00-01: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 March 2023 10:48 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: congress@ietf.org
Delivered-To: congress@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C9AC15152E; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 03:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: congress-chairs@ietf.org, congress@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 9.14.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <167896372801.51140.11818497949033592367@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 03:48:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/F1lxs1_zzfPcjXJjdhNc9CJJvqA>
Subject: [Congress] Éric Vyncke's Block on charter-ietf-congress-00-01: (with BLOCK and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: congress@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "Discussions about the CONGestion RESponse and Signaling \(CONGRESS\) Working Group" <congress.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/congress/>
List-Post: <mailto:congress@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/congress>, <mailto:congress-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 10:48:48 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-congress-00-01: Block

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-congress/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Indeed, the world has changed since TCP is no more *the* protocol, so this work
is welcome.

Thanks for addressing one of my previous BLOCK issue about the rechartering.

alas, the other previous BLOCK point still stands: it is about the mismatch of
the unique deliverable of this WG with the very broad scope ? The current
charter appears to be more suited for a directorate (doing reviews of WG
documents) than for a WG (publishing documents).


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thank you for partly addressing my previous comment about `empirical evidence
of safety` as "safety" was rather vague (now it is clear). "Empirical" is still
rather vague, should it rather be "experimental" ?