[Congress] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-congress-00-01: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 March 2023 13:18 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: congress-chairs@ietf.org, congress@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <167897270066.37331.520862660516171148@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 06:18:20 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/congress/o91R5Awa00PfFUBWvGQA3SUbFKI>
Subject: [Congress] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-congress-00-01: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-congress-00-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-congress/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll broadly supportive of chartering this WG, and doing the congestion work in
a central place makes sense to me.

I found this charter hard to read on my tablet, so would suggest formatting it
to a slightly shorter line width, 72 cols maybe?

I would suggest deleting "CONGRESS will not remain open simply because “in
case” further work comes along."

[Congress] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charte… Robert Wilton via Datatracker