Re: [core] Review of draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation

[JinHyeock Choi <[e-mail]>]

Bill

>>     ol=http://[FDFD::123]:61616, coap://[2001:db8:f1::2]:5683
>>
>> corresponds to
>>
>>     "eps": [
>>       {"ep": "http://[FDFD::123]:61616"},
>>       {"ep": "coaps://[2001:db8:f1::2]:5683"}
>>     ]
>>
> That is good. Going forward, the mapping would become easier: We've defined
> "ol" to be repeatable instead of a comma separated list of base URIs. For
> example,
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation-08#section-6.1

thanks for the clarification. I mistakenly referred the examples from v08.

>> There still exisit some differences
>> (e.g., URI in "ep" shall have IP address in its authority.),
>> which, I hope, we would discuss in joint meeting next FRI.
>>
> If you are participating in IETF 101, we can also arrange a corridor
> discussion around this topic. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts
> here too.

Unfortunately IETF 101 conflicts with OCF meeting in Prague.
However FRI afternoon, we will have a T2TRG/ OCF/ WoT joint meeting there,
https://github.com/t2trg/2018-03-ocf-wot
so your participation would be much appreciated.

best regards

JinHyeock