Re: [core] Review of draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation

Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com> Mon, 19 March 2018 10:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD0E12DA29 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 03:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ericsson.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuxmLBTM3Y8U for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 03:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0820F126FB3 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 03:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=ericsson.com; s=mailgw201801; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@ericsson.com; t=1521456633; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:CC:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=V3LzSNO6GsGVCHJDrz2Rgi9nN8Eyoj8caKHZl7GLxTI=; b=PW7oUT9VUrS8m9TPpwUKu1UHJcWs39ggVFPhjWP10mYKLgLw7wuChEw6LLmCuNq6 blxJlI0VSVhbvERnwNsQUdPP2HLoWz8Ry4/skHIGx9vHRQISHwGS+wM4E3NvFfA+ G3KjIBCzcXbtLrs8m7+I3QE39OGL9Ec+MF6JKH6zpZE=;
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-87c029c000005540-3c-5aaf95f8ac13
Received: from ESESSHC024.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.183.90]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 08.69.21824.8F59FAA5; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:50:33 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB107.ericsson.se ([169.254.7.151]) by ESESSHC024.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.90]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:50:10 +0100
From: Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>
To: JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com>
CC: Bill Silverajan <bilhanan.silverajan@tut.fi>, "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>, "t2trg-chairs@irtf.org" <t2trg-chairs@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [core] Review of draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation
Thread-Index: AQHTv3AMpAeSG1xbxk2mfPE1eQABsw==
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:50:10 +0000
Message-ID: <237126CD-5E63-41CB-A0E9-1F8E9ADF2716@ericsson.com>
References: <CAOqz15pcTiZdnKhxqkRtNeHS9Xrq5PYvVPMBvUWfhg-jSzsimQ@mail.gmail.com> <0cc8bfd6-2f50-83b6-d392-e80de133ce34@tut.fi> <CAOqz15rS6hpjzr-RW_u1_14nFXVtOe68pj6qVWvDGxkNz0SZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOqz15rS6hpjzr-RW_u1_14nFXVtOe68pj6qVWvDGxkNz0SZ7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [31.133.128.199]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_63050CFB-C35E-4B04-88D4-84005C7675B4"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM2J7lO7PqeujDI72M1tcPCVrse/temaL p6t2sFrcm3SRyYHFY+esu+weS5b8ZPKYvPEwm8f86SsYA1iiuGxSUnMyy1KL9O0SuDJOLbzD XrAhpmLPcvsGxomhXYycHBICJhIrJr1i7WLk4hASOMwosXTJPyYIZwmjxKul75hAqtgEnCU+ PWtkB7FFBNQkDk+dAmYzC8xklJjakgliCwsESMyYPgGqJlCi+ewSRghbT+L564esIDaLgKrE vytbmUFsXgF7icdblzNDLDvOKNG5/wdYMydQ8/edS1lAbEYBMYnvp9YwQSwTl7j1ZD4TxNki Eg8vnmaDsEUlXj7+xwphK0ls2f+FHWQos8AURollcw+yQ2wTlDg58wnLBEaRWUhmzUJWNwtJ HURRkkTLxiY2CFtbYtnC18wQtqbE/u7lLJjiGhKd3yayQtimEq+PfmSEsK0lZvw6CDVHUWJK 90P2BYzcqxhFi1OLi3PTjYz1Uosyk4uL8/P08lJLNjECY/zglt+6OxhXv3Y8xCjAwajEw8s5 cX2UEGtiWXFl7iFGFaA5jzasvsAoxZKXn5eqJML79Mq6KCHelMTKqtSi/Pii0pzU4kOM0hws SuK8Jz15o4QE0hNLUrNTUwtSi2CyTBycUg2M1TcXeKRMX124cKGjnnHol+iJjFW+aWeaGKQ9 Oubzf5n5+Hvr9uw9D+IVH2/du65Er/RA9NmSP7Ez4mbbcab7mGx+dopx9YzSbyo5sZMMNkjm WuY8+v69+hmn143ERTcEAuqnWH1Xe/hIo9zt06+piZ9v39qo8aNjVUPLZun4uvd/tLpXNG2U UGIpzkg01GIuKk4EAL8flb75AgAA
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wQpfLiN_Z3bMSML1O8pOyTLwF5g>
Subject: Re: [core] Review of draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:50:42 -0000

Hi JinHyeock, hi T2TRG chairs,

would it be possible for you to share in this thread the remote participation details of the T2TRG/ OCF/ WoT join meeting?

Thanks!
- - Jaime Jiménez

> On 16 Mar 2018, at 1.03, JinHyeock Choi <jinchoe@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Bill
> 
>>>    ol=http://[FDFD::123]:61616, coap://[2001:db8:f1::2]:5683
>>> 
>>> corresponds to
>>> 
>>>    "eps": [
>>>      {"ep": "http://[FDFD::123]:61616"},
>>>      {"ep": "coaps://[2001:db8:f1::2]:5683"}
>>>    ]
>>> 
>> That is good. Going forward, the mapping would become easier: We've defined
>> "ol" to be repeatable instead of a comma separated list of base URIs. For
>> example,
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-silverajan-core-coap-protocol-negotiation-08#section-6.1
> 
> thanks for the clarification. I mistakenly referred the examples from v08.
> 
>>> There still exisit some differences
>>> (e.g., URI in "ep" shall have IP address in its authority.),
>>> which, I hope, we would discuss in joint meeting next FRI.
>>> 
>> If you are participating in IETF 101, we can also arrange a corridor
>> discussion around this topic. I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts
>> here too.
> 
> Unfortunately IETF 101 conflicts with OCF meeting in Prague.
> However FRI afternoon, we will have a T2TRG/ OCF/ WoT joint meeting there,
> https://github.com/t2trg/2018-03-ocf-wot
> so your participation would be much appreciated.
> 
> best regards
> 
> JinHyeock