Re: [core] issues for stateless AD review

Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi> Tue, 06 October 2020 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jaime@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1895D3A0B29 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NP5sW-2JDtZo for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:26:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wforward4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wforward4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFEB3A0B21 for <core@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 08:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA9CA42; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:26:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Oct 2020 11:26:55 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=XsrpNh dZiPrv1MOyJkvCw5Ea/gtPBMNlc03h9NoZ5EQ=; b=rp67btJqyFBkxNFvRp/3ip +WiqiRovZ+7ZVLgfVvmh0CI7mL6E+OEeTZKFp0qsI6C42kbiAwypiSF4VlfEXmBr RxkOJDt4uOK/qEsyHs+NrKxSryQT+8HexEXtnwpaGGxnGOFQT6+TfDoWuweu0inT F8/mVNJCj9M5KvhzCn4G5SE0BoAutvYk3OvN7EG5Z8Hy0ZUmsS3Mfo2sxeBwDIPk PimGzHiE79d8be600sSLe9syaT6ovNJk2T/OgnlX6GUtgvRh5bKtkWJLebJ51ZTc uUE8oqtB8sMXHNrvoAJzrQ28IV0zAzUSn51dxLd88OOanCgRBiokhBV5Mfi+C8Vg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vYx8X9x4HtsDb0lecmxJq3yldZMv9iWsR87T_jOfhHP1TKEKfejwSA> <xme:vYx8X9Q5VSdQTs_degnYpZjg3th_J10zHBqyj7AD2CnUm7tUpTLWJM3JooScGduXU _pheUejvvGJ-oEHog>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrgeeggdekkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomheplfgrihhmvgcu lfhimhornhgviicuoehjrghimhgvsehikhhirdhfiheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfe fhhfefgeffvedvudeuvedvfeelieelheeiheehgeekheehlefhtdduffdthfejnecuffho mhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpshgrnhguvghlmhgrnhdrtggrpdhivghtfhdroh hrghenucfkphepkeejrdelfedrvdehrdefheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehjrghimhgvsehikhhirdhfih
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vYx8X3VvDnCjedl17EmW8ypBdcUXY6N3WsVBWOOnXxvekkn_9K99OA> <xmx:vYx8X_j-BylYEcl4tpqlp0NsDbKadVFXKuGOxfBYGqqLHHz3WiV2GQ> <xmx:vYx8X_AjXgDH1wxviiGEgc57pYgN6PCJv9GuJuyqjiHwFsX7dZ46_A> <xmx:vox8XyomTFj4bFSyyTl9wtv3_KYGXnQDwtSxRoOETTVIJoJar861MzLklq8>
Received: from EMB-918HFH01 (87-93-25-35.bb.dnainternet.fi [87.93.25.35]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 290393280060; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 11:26:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 18:26:51 +0300
From: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, core@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20201006152651.cmlnyp5bspj6rdzw@EMB-918HFH01>
References: <30317.1601403281@localhost> <99764840-E759-40AF-A80D-1E5F4984C334@tzi.org> <29736.1601491640@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <29736.1601491640@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/EGz0esu-_ZZpG9LzYW6cmJFWfaI>
Subject: Re: [core] issues for stateless AD review
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:26:58 -0000

Hi Michael,

I am curious, what was the issue with pip and xml2rfc

Ciao!
-- Jaime

On 30.09.2020 14:47, Michael Richardson wrote:
>Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>    > We should replace confusing I-D text here:
>
>    > #8 use automated key management due to AES-CCM/BCP107
>    > https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/8
>
>I have created pull request #11 for this.
>Please comment
>
>    > I think we can simply explain a wontfix on:
>
>    > #3 is stateless updating 7252 on distinguishing unrecognized vs invalid
>    > extension?  https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/3
>
>    > #4 how does freshness window of client/intermediate interact?
>    > https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/4
>
>    > #6 can larger tokens fill responder memory?
>    > https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/6
>
>    > #7 how to size the replay window?
>    > https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/7
>
>    > #9 look ma, no state!  https://github.com/core-wg/stateless/issues/9
>
>--
>]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
>]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
>]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>core mailing list
>core@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core