IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] stateless issue #10 -- 60 minutes

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 01 October 2020 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5233A0937 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o8HzxslGXkDI for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0823A0925 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C2Qj70w4WzyTT; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 23:08:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <10453.1601583731@localhost>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:08:58 +0200
Cc: core@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 623279338.638893-721e3c3b3d040f965358c4feca025d2f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <75C3FE62-EDC9-47FD-8C91-30D36EBA8ABA@tzi.org>
References: <30317.1601403281@localhost> <14916.1601576583@localhost> <1183A55C-B2E5-4B73-9A90-B5E19F9F4B80@tzi.org> <10453.1601583731@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/ZISLGzaobRqnAwauorcDmaQHDiM>
Subject: Re: [core] stateless issue #10 -- 60 minutes
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 21:09:03 -0000

On 2020-10-01, at 22:22, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> On 2020-10-01, at 20:23, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't see how ACK_TIMEOUT relates.
> 
>> It doesn’t.
>> The way that RFC 7252 manages (not-so) constants like that does.
> 
> I thought that the suggestion was to have the value somehow be some function
> of ACK_TIMEOUT.

No, I don’t see how they are related.

> I guess you mean, that it would be specified in the same fashion?

Yes, the transmission parameters in Section 4.8 are a good way to contain the “need to pick out of thin air” values we rely on… 

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email