IETF Logo Mail Archive

[core] content-formats for cbor YANG

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Thu, 20 April 2017 08:46 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D99012EB8C for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.621
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.621 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LG8GsMreDo10 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net [194.109.24.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9269F12EB7B for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl ([IPv6:2001:888:0:22:194:109:20:200]) by smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net with ESMTP id AYm81v00F5W6tKc01Ym8AM; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:46:08 +0200
Received: from 2001:983:a264:1:dc7e:9a28:c63a:a3ad by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:46:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:46:08 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: Core <core@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Mail-Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
Message-ID: <c2b6fb6e92c6a5680e544963e88d5fa7@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/G6dvHV3NSUTFeqHS8goybv-sCDQ>
Subject: [core] content-formats for cbor YANG
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 08:46:12 -0000

Hi Core,

Following the discussion on CoMI content-formats during ietf98, I want 
to propose the following;

Draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor deines the content-format 
application/yang+cbor which defines CBOR documents which contain the 
results of the mapping of a YANG document to CBOR as specified in the 
draft.

Draft-ietf-core-comi defines two additional content-formats:
1) application/yang-fetch+cbor that specifies the contents and semantics 
of a FETCH CoMI request payload
2) application/yang-patch+cbor that specifies the contents and semantics 
of a PATCH CoMI request payload

Looking forward to alternative proposals or noises of approval.

Greetings,

Peter

-- 
Peter van der Stok
vanderstok consultancy
mailto: consultancy@vanderstok.org
www: www.vanderstok.org
tel NL: +31(0)492474673     F: +33(0)966015248

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email