Re: [core] content-formats for cbor YANG

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

>> If we move in that direction (structural interoperability), do we need 
>> to define a different Content-Format for each one used by CoMI?
>> - value
>> - CBOR array (instance-identifier)
>> - CBOR array (value)
>> - CBOR array (instance-identifier, value)
> 
> Oh, right, I wasn’t aware that we use all of them.
> 
> So this would be (all in application/___+cbor):
> 
> yang-value
> yang-ids
> yang-values
> yang-set (or just yang)
> 
> This could be four media types, or one media type with four different
> values for a parameter.  Since, in both cases, we will have four
> different content-formats in the end, I’d go with four media types so
> we can minimize confusion.

Because the CoMI text now says that the payload of an array of one item 
can be optimized to just one item,
I like to suppress the yang-value+cbor and only retain the 
yang-values+cbor

Cheerio, Peter

> 
> Grüße, Carsten