IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub

Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io> Wed, 31 August 2016 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <a@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDEC12DABF; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YX4iOQ9Pc4Bf; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C8D12DAA2; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 03:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.142]) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CF3A80D8; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:23:44 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter14-d.gandi.net
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.195]) by mfilter14-d.gandi.net (mfilter14-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MilGJicQdd1F; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:23:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 188.130.77.134
Received: from [172.16.0.20] (ppp-134.net-188-130-77.static.magiconline.fr [188.130.77.134]) (Authenticated sender: alex@ackl.io) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5FC0BA80DD; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:23:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3E515CA3-E394-4EDF-94B4-F72E5E97169A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>
In-Reply-To: <CANF4ybvHKV-ty+tTiP5NYDbP32TSCt6pq+4V0e0nX6AibKH-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:23:44 +0200
Message-Id: <207852EB-C406-4276-AADC-31ED3A626339@ackl.io>
References: <CDE6F224-7A6A-4F89-9E5C-E46AC9FACA35@ericsson.com> <CANF4ybvHKV-ty+tTiP5NYDbP32TSCt6pq+4V0e0nX6AibKH-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/GzjcJIkSeaKblDqP8UAKGNPMiSo>
Cc: "draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub@ietf.org" <draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:23:49 -0000

Dear all,

+1 on the adoption of this draft. For me, the PubSub functionality is essential and without it we’re leaving a big hole in the CoAP realm.

There are of course things which we should discuss, and most have been pointed out by the other supporters. 

A point on which we should be aware is that if we want application level security, this will imply the use of Asymmetric keys / Certificates. If we want to keep PSK as a way of authentication, then probably we should provide some mechanisms for the Broker to be used as a trusted third-party, which validates the end-devices.

Best,
Alexander


> Le 30 août 2016 à 20:41, James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I support this I-D as I think it's useful.  
> 
> I have a question.
> 
> Section 3.5 Brokerless pubsub
> 
> - I suggest to move this section to section 3.1.
>  
> - This architecture is more applicable to CoAP Proxy.  
> 
> - I also suggest to add the pubsub capability at CoAP Proxy.
> 
> James
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com <mailto:jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>> wrote:
> Dear CoRE-WG,
> 
> As we discussed at last IETF96, working group adoption has been requested for draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub. At the IETF meeting the room consensus was strongly supporting adoption (~10 people). Please reply to the list with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment.
> 
> Since there are several concurrent WGA calls, we will end the call on August 26, 2016.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jaime and Carsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org <mailto:core@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> James Nguyen
> Email: james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com <mailto:james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>_______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email