Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub

James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com> Tue, 30 August 2016 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AB712D878; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYf_zEvOysuJ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:42:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01BA112D7BB; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id x131so181920664ite.0; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EDSQk6w+QHXrV2E7i7TDIEoNYZU1kJrLdi8puFcIIjE=; b=EXwL7ISGXNBqMjHO+MY8rKEWqE2M3796Omx1xWUHWQ5hqOvWw2yYxfpY964dOksvgj CA9scEmUNGPxVAcOIqn4H7kwMrJg7l0q0bXbfIgE3tzIm2hWxy9SpQmymkk94Xs1kuAo FyhkqVBC9CxeRhlWECS6JN3W2EvtxjIzCHMHFrapqWhQp4cZh7dET2Xn8xnam3vvIwUA u04V92ZHpOyLrLMowyfLJB/hX+M/vYGYWp/db+u08B6D5UM1nvrKyW1NBGMn832WCsK/ Ti/QgqV3nWiErb0l4BJOXBCcCixjtVILp4dITz3pPZRJQ+X7W2zYIQNhIMnVkl9L0+VG AJ4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EDSQk6w+QHXrV2E7i7TDIEoNYZU1kJrLdi8puFcIIjE=; b=VjFG6ClEbeqO80UbJ8/YJGraMrMgkszahXg3UxsCF47ve1fa/PtYsQe3rYTJBUnOH1 xF3DchL7H2ixRW6vE3qiG4Zs+z2r5jpSufsKvcBVfUxS4p2ZREOQ0nZBzHPff9kQLiuK 3+jBRCUpc5++M6PQTrcip6RCVMADOwvE+9ykbrP/5vGkm0yPSOpMxnO4hICYsmKDGcIt mXr9uhTpN/HNOXIt6Dm7wbXyNd5KvQCWDr7HBF17flcTxuF+qO3xltNH3tOCij2prh3x 3eAViNhSsNgX1jTYqAUgmB2VtvrNN/C5xcxFt2D7GP3E46+1Dbj7GlrYbBgxYDNCv5g5 LCKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNUcrUQTHESVOOyqmu8c9Mq2VRc8uDzW8hZzG/ijp8tXXrcUC2yXZgwwfq7jzZUdmaTsFLgoTYHBmXEEA==
X-Received: by 10.36.190.197 with SMTP id i188mr5974550itf.92.1472582514982; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.79.132.129 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CDE6F224-7A6A-4F89-9E5C-E46AC9FACA35@ericsson.com>
References: <CDE6F224-7A6A-4F89-9E5C-E46AC9FACA35@ericsson.com>
From: James Nguyen <james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:41:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CANF4ybvHKV-ty+tTiP5NYDbP32TSCt6pq+4V0e0nX6AibKH-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0dee30b566fb053b4e55da"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/jEVfPVDhOu9e639N4TjDoWpLfIY>
Cc: "draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub@ietf.org" <draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub@ietf.org>, "core@ietf.org WG" <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption of draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:42:08 -0000

Hi,

I support this I-D as I think it's useful.

I have a question.

Section 3.5 Brokerless pubsub

- I suggest to move this section to section 3.1.

- This architecture is more applicable to CoAP Proxy.

- I also suggest to add the pubsub capability at CoAP Proxy.

James


On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Jaime Jiménez <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Dear CoRE-WG,
>
> As we discussed at last IETF96, working group adoption has been requested
> for draft-koster-core-coap-pubsub. At the IETF meeting the room consensus
> was strongly supporting adoption (~10 people). Please reply to the list
> with your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you
> support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment.
>
> Since there are several concurrent WGA calls, we will end the call on *August
> 26, 2016*.
>
> Thanks,
> Jaime and Carsten
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>
>


-- 
James Nguyen
Email: james.huy.nguyen@gmail.com