IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] đź”” WGLC of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 25 September 2019 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC941200C4 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aYwhkIMjeVFv for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DEC120048 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.110] (p548DCE50.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46dgJM6NrPzybJ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:22:59 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5B5D2B94-0989-4F9B-86C0-F08EC6BB13B9@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:22:59 +0200
Cc: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, CoRE WG <core@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 591114177.50062-38a3442c6485c2608e6a5a7848de3b57
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <AE07DD67-D54E-431E-8BE3-2554000F4B79@tzi.org>
References: <20190925092617.yhlk4dhvjm7gh3oz@EMB-918HFH01> <5B5D2B94-0989-4F9B-86C0-F08EC6BB13B9@arm.com>
To: Thomas Fossati <Thomas.Fossati@arm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/JjvDz4itujex6yf025os2AvT1T0>
Subject: Re: [core] đź”” WGLC of draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:23:03 -0000

Hi Thomas,

> I've read draft-ietf-core-senml-more-units-01 and it looks like
> a very nicely written document.
> 
> I’ve left a couple of tiny editorial suggestions in a PR.

Thank you!

> 
> WRT the note in Section 4:
> 
>    "[So does this spec update RFC 8428?]"
> 
> I guess the answer is yes?

I think so, as the Unit names defined in the secondary registry are now defined as acceptable in SenML unit fields where previously only the primary ones were.  So we can delete the note.

I added the “updates” legend to -01, but forgot to add the requisite information in abstract and intro that would explain that legend.  Now https://github.com/core-wg/senml-more-units/issues/2 —— https://github.com/core-wg/senml-more-units/commit/61cb6396935bec49c192e8debe7f4b0156a56e7f is a proposal to handle this issue.

GrĂĽĂźe, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email