Re: [core] FW: New Version Notification for draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt

Hi Akbar, thank you very much for this.

I think you are providing a really good service to the working group
in keeping the background discussion on this important topic alive.

Personally, I think that providing a set of in-protocol mechanisms (a
bunch of Options, basically) to tackle well known and understood
scenarios (as opposed to a fully fledged architecture to support
Sleepy nodes, which other SDOs are in a better position to provide) is
something that is perfectly in scope with CoAP goals and WG interest
and energy  -- as you sensed it back in August.

And yes, I'd have given you my +1 when you polled the mailing list
about this, if I weren't on holiday :-)

Cheers

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Rahman, Akbar
<Akbar.Rahman@interdigital.com> wrote:
> Hi Carsten (and WG),
>
>
> I wrote a short draft based on the following question from IETF-87 (Berlin):
>
>         "Should we have a CORE deliverable for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?"
>
>         http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/current/msg04750.html
>
>
>
> Any and all comments will be much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Akbar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:34 PM
> To: Rahman, Akbar; Rahman, Akbar
> Subject: New Version Notification fordraft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Akbar Rahman and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Filename:        draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need
> Revision:        00
> Title:           Sleepy Devices: Do we need to Support them in CORE?
> Creation date:   2013-10-11
> Group:           Individual Submission
> Number of pages: 6
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>    This document summarizes the discussion in the CORE WG related to the
>    question of whether support of sleepy devices is required for the
>    CoAP protocol, CORE Link Format, CORE Resource Directory, etc.  The
>    only goal of this document is to trigger discussions in the CORE WG
>    so that all relevant considerations for sleeping devices are taken
>    into account.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core