[core] FW: New Version Notification for draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt

["Rahman, Akbar" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Carsten (and WG),


I wrote a short draft based on the following question from IETF-87 (Berlin):

	"Should we have a CORE deliverable for CoAP support of Sleepy Nodes?"

	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core/current/msg04750.html



Any and all comments will be much appreciated.



Akbar

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:34 PM
To: Rahman, Akbar; Rahman, Akbar
Subject: New Version Notification fordraft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Akbar Rahman and posted to the IETF repository.

Filename:	 draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need
Revision:	 00
Title:		 Sleepy Devices: Do we need to Support them in CORE?
Creation date:	 2013-10-11
Group:		 Individual Submission
Number of pages: 6
URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00.txt
Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need
Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rahman-core-sleepy-nodes-do-we-need-00


Abstract:
   This document summarizes the discussion in the CORE WG related to the
   question of whether support of sleepy devices is required for the
   CoAP protocol, CORE Link Format, CORE Resource Directory, etc.  The
   only goal of this document is to trigger discussions in the CORE WG
   so that all relevant considerations for sleeping devices are taken
   into account.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat