Re: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt

"Oflynn, Colin" <Colin.OFlynn@atmel.com> Sat, 20 March 2010 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <Colin.OFlynn@atmel.com>
X-Original-To: core@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F20A3A696C for <core@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.565, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vk2bFJlp3nzy for <core@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjogate2.atmel.com (newsmtp5.atmel.com [204.2.163.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609763A6886 for <core@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from csomb01.corp.atmel.com ([10.95.30.150]) by sjogate2.atmel.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o2K7ocSh020225; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAC802.48C9D854"
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:48:27 -0600
Message-ID: <C6471264338047459F18230B4F871DA0098F04D2@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcrHxlLYIq4RWXThRmChK8tGEqbK8wAO2dDO
References: <7E1DF37F1F42AB4E877E492C308E6AC4049AD02A@XCH57YKF.rim.net> <89398737-3CB4-429A-829E-7BA2A709BCB9@cisco.com>
From: "Oflynn, Colin" <Colin.OFlynn@atmel.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Rene Struik <rstruik@certicom.com>
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/core>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:52:37 -0000

Hi Cullen & Rene,

I was going to offer to squeeze up my time slot if needed anyway ;-)

I think it makes more sense for Rene to go first, as I'll build on his security architecture. I would propose the following sort of presentation within the 30min period:

10 mins Rene
10 mins Colin
10 mins Discussion / Extra Material

If you need more time Rene I can squeeze mine down, or we can make it more just a presentation & no questions! I'm not sure how the IETF presentations normally run.

Also: is there projector facilities etc provided? Anything specific we should know?

Regards,

  -Colin


-----Original Message-----
From: core-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Cullen Jennings
Sent: Sat 20/03/2010 00:43
To: Rene Struik
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt
 

Ah, It's my fault Rene. I had it on my todo list for a week to go fix this part of the agenda. The questions I'm not sure about is how it to mix/sequence your presentation and Colin's presentation. 

But I'm not really sure the right amount of time to allocate for theses two and I'm not sure the best way to cover both at the same time. I do want to talk about them in one presentation as there is lots over overlap in the discussion. Can you and Colin see if you can figure out a proposal for best way to run the discussion on these two drafts? Perhaps one way would be to have you take 10 minutes before Colin and preset the security big picture then have Colin cover the part from his draft? Thoughts from anyone on best way to structure the time and have a productive discussion? 

Again - new agenda tomorrow. But yes, one way or the other, there will be some time on the agenda for this.

Cullen


On Mar 17, 2010, at 15:20 , Rene Struik wrote:

> Dear Carsten, Cullen:
> 
> I just reviewed the agenda for the 6lowapp meeting at IETF-77 and, to my
> surprise, noticed that the presentation slot you presumably allocated to
> me was not there. Please correct.
> 
> Cell: +1 (416) 433-7880
> 
> Best regards, Rene
> 
> Agenda CORE WG 
> IETF-77, Anaheim, CA, USA
> -----------------------------------
> DRAFT Agenda created March 10
> 
> Time:
> 	Thursday, Mar 25, 9:00 to 11:30
> 
> Chairs:
>     	Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
>     	Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
> 
> Mailing Lists:
>     	General Discussion: core@ietf.org
>     	To Subscribe:       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> 
> Wiki & Status: 
> 	http://tools.ietf.org/wg/core/
> 
> 
> 
> Agenda Bash and Status          (Chairs 10 min)
> 	- Note takers
> 	- Jabber Scribes
> 
> 
> CoAP requirements and protocol proposal (Zach Shelby 50 min)
> 	draft-shelby-core-coap-req-00.txt
> 	draft-shelby-core-coap-00.txt
> 
> 
> Bootstrap discussion (Colin Oflynn 30 min)
> 	draft-oflynn-core-bootstrapping-00
> 
> 
> Compressed IPfix (Lothar Braun 30 min)
> 	draft-braun-core-compressed-ipfix-01.txt
> 
> 
> Other Topics (Working Group 30 min)
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
core mailing list
core@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core