Re: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt

Let's make this 15 min, 15 min, 15 minutes. It's really important to be able to get discussion going and find out if there is agreement around ideas and proposals. We will also end up being clarifying questions and such during the presentation. It's really hard to get 7 minutes of material presented in less than 15 minutes of time at IETF so I added more time to this.  If we end up using less time than needed, that's fine. 

On Mar 20, 2010, at 24:48 , Oflynn, Colin wrote:

> Hi Cullen & Rene,
> 
> I was going to offer to squeeze up my time slot if needed anyway ;-)
> 
> I think it makes more sense for Rene to go first, as I'll build on his security architecture. I would propose the following sort of presentation within the 30min period:
> 
> 10 mins Rene
> 10 mins Colin
> 10 mins Discussion / Extra Material
> 
> If you need more time Rene I can squeeze mine down, or we can make it more just a presentation & no questions! I'm not sure how the IETF presentations normally run.
> 
> Also: is there projector facilities etc provided? Anything specific we should know?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   -Colin
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: core-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: Sat 20/03/2010 00:43
> To: Rene Struik
> Cc: core@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [core] CORE anddraft-struik-6lowapp-security-considerations-00.txt
> 
> 
> Ah, It's my fault Rene. I had it on my todo list for a week to go fix this part of the agenda. The questions I'm not sure about is how it to mix/sequence your presentation and Colin's presentation.
> 
> But I'm not really sure the right amount of time to allocate for theses two and I'm not sure the best way to cover both at the same time. I do want to talk about them in one presentation as there is lots over overlap in the discussion. Can you and Colin see if you can figure out a proposal for best way to run the discussion on these two drafts? Perhaps one way would be to have you take 10 minutes before Colin and preset the security big picture then have Colin cover the part from his draft? Thoughts from anyone on best way to structure the time and have a productive discussion?
> 
> Again - new agenda tomorrow. But yes, one way or the other, there will be some time on the agenda for this.
> 
> Cullen
> 
> 
> On Mar 17, 2010, at 15:20 , Rene Struik wrote:
> 
> > Dear Carsten, Cullen:
> >
> > I just reviewed the agenda for the 6lowapp meeting at IETF-77 and, to my
> > surprise, noticed that the presentation slot you presumably allocated to
> > me was not there. Please correct.
> >
> > Cell: +1 (416) 433-7880
> >
> > Best regards, Rene
> >
> > Agenda CORE WG
> > IETF-77, Anaheim, CA, USA
> > -----------------------------------
> > DRAFT Agenda created March 10
> >
> > Time:
> >       Thursday, Mar 25, 9:00 to 11:30
> >
> > Chairs:
> >       Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
> >       Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
> >
> > Mailing Lists:
> >       General Discussion: core@ietf.org
> >       To Subscribe:       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> >
> > Wiki & Status:
> >       http://tools.ietf.org/wg/core/
> >
> >
> >
> > Agenda Bash and Status          (Chairs 10 min)
> >       - Note takers
> >       - Jabber Scribes
> >
> >
> > CoAP requirements and protocol proposal (Zach Shelby 50 min)
> >       draft-shelby-core-coap-req-00.txt
> >       draft-shelby-core-coap-00.txt
> >
> >
> > Bootstrap discussion (Colin Oflynn 30 min)
> >       draft-oflynn-core-bootstrapping-00
> >
> >
> > Compressed IPfix (Lothar Braun 30 min)
> >       draft-braun-core-compressed-ipfix-01.txt
> >
> >
> > Other Topics (Working Group 30 min)
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> 
> 

Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html