Re: [core] Stateless proxy and Request-Tag

['Christian Amsüss' <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 08:28:51AM -0700, Jim Schaad wrote:
> If it is a fetch then it has payload

In the Block2:1 request? That's good to hear b/c that's what I thought
but couldn't support.

Still, that leaves any messages that are Block2:>0 with an empty payload
undecidible for a proxy (could be tail of Block1+2, could be just tail
of Block2 and the request body is just empty), on which it'd need to
tack a Request-Tag, so as to ensure that the correct result of an
earlier Block1+2 operation is pulled out of the server.

(I'm not saying I'd advocate build servers that have such statefullness,
but 7959 allows such constructs, and I'd like to see all of that work
through a stateless proxy.)

KR
c

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom