IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] đź”” WG last call for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06

Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com> Mon, 25 April 2022 08:29 UTC

Return-Path: <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE8A3A1233 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 01:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wgMZwKTc5UDf for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 01:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [31.22.13.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D7C63A1229 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 01:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.jpshallow.com ([192.168.0.3] helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>) id 1niu5n-00086A-9K; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:29:11 +0100
From: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>
To: 'Carsten Bormann' <cabo@tzi.org>, core@ietf.org
References: <390A7518-0E4D-4D91-AC4F-46307AC43EAD@tzi.org> <7623D33B-7126-44EB-BE3B-361CD3B7DFF3@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <7623D33B-7126-44EB-BE3B-361CD3B7DFF3@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:29:09 +0100
Message-ID: <01e401d8587e$88c1de80$9a459b80$@jpshallow.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQFbEm4GEl/QPbJAZe1qHqhAH80cogK2G1JBreUla5A=
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/Z3978VEUvS3sJ5DPI2Pk0Qea_00>
Subject: Re: [core] đź”” WG last call for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 08:29:24 -0000

Hi Carsten,

My apologies, I did read through the draft as well as your proposed changes, but got side-tracked before responding.

They both look good to me, just a couple of very minor comments.

There appears to be ambiguity between "g._" and "g.*" which looks like a rendering issue.
As it happens, libcoap also supports group communications.

Regards

Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Bormann [mailto: cabo@tzi.org]
> Sent: 25 April 2022 08:56
> To: core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)
> Subject: Re: [core] đź”” WG last call for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06
> 
> On 2022-04-02, at 22:11, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> >
> > In our IETF113 CoRE meeting, we diagnosed draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-
> bis-06 as ready for WG last call.  So:
> >
> > This starts a WG last call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-
> core-groupcomm-bis/06/, ending on
> >
> >    24:00 UTC on Tuesday, April 19, 2022.
> >
> > Please indicate your position in a message to the CoRE mailing list
> (core@ietf.org) or, exceptionally, to the chairs (core-chairs@ietf.org).
> 
> We didn’t get a lot of feedback here; this is not yet enough to close the WG
> last call (we don’t usually run WGLCs on “Qui tacet consentire videtur”).
> 
> Those who have read this:
> Please do state your opinion, even if it is a single “I have read this; LGTM”.
> 
> Those who haven’t: Now obviously would be a good time to have a look.
> Feedback is also very useful if you focus on just a specific component.
> 
> (<hats_off>Not trying to influence this, but just to speed it up: If you are
> looking for discussion items to agree/disagree with, my review is at
> <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/PtqtDE_3PWR-n-
> o_z9h0HxW2vDI>.)
> 
> GrĂĽĂźe, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email