Re: [core] đź”” WG last call for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 25 April 2022 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63533A0AAC for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8q6GnjTP9nd for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 055503A0AE5 for <core@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 00:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Kmy592bT6zDCjy; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:56:29 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <390A7518-0E4D-4D91-AC4F-46307AC43EAD@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:56:29 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 672566188.94736-8b3ed4e3d7379314f0808e665b947d55
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7623D33B-7126-44EB-BE3B-361CD3B7DFF3@tzi.org>
References: <390A7518-0E4D-4D91-AC4F-46307AC43EAD@tzi.org>
To: "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/leIAON0Ilku_c6KrloMtrl0nngA>
Subject: Re: [core] đź”” WG last call for draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:56:38 -0000

On 2022-04-02, at 22:11, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> In our IETF113 CoRE meeting, we diagnosed draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis-06 as ready for WG last call.  So:
> 
> This starts a WG last call for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-groupcomm-bis/06/, ending on
> 
>    24:00 UTC on Tuesday, April 19, 2022.
> 
> Please indicate your position in a message to the CoRE mailing list (core@ietf.org) or, exceptionally, to the chairs (core-chairs@ietf.org).

We didn’t get a lot of feedback here; this is not yet enough to close the WG last call (we don’t usually run WGLCs on “Qui tacet consentire videtur”).

Those who have read this: 
Please do state your opinion, even if it is a single “I have read this; LGTM”.

Those who haven’t: Now obviously would be a good time to have a look.
Feedback is also very useful if you focus on just a specific component.

(<hats_off>Not trying to influence this, but just to speed it up: If you are looking for discussion items to agree/disagree with, my review is at  <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/PtqtDE_3PWR-n-o_z9h0HxW2vDI>.)

GrĂĽĂźe, Carsten