Re: [core] [IANA #1232194] Ballot issued: <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-04.txt> to Proposed Standard
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 16 June 2022 07:32 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98BBC15AAF4 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9M5DJ8D4qB_i for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:32:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0818EC15AAE3 for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LNv5g3BG5zDChZ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:32:39 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-3187-1655264136-441.1232194-37-0@icann.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:32:38 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10D0E644-1EB8-42D0-ACFD-FF4039C48D75@tzi.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1232194@icann.org> <165484719991.47293.693683777282566206@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.4.3-3368-1655263984-1915.1232194-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-3187-1655264136-441.1232194-37-0@icann.org>
To: core@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/_6kq3hWM_4x82DdqfOu-MgAXm3s>
Subject: Re: [core] [IANA #1232194] Ballot issued: <draft-ietf-core-problem-details-04.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:32:48 -0000
To address the observation from IANA cited below, we changed the “first-come-first-served” policy for the Custom Problem Detail Key registry to “expert review” and added: >> The expert is instructed to attempt making the registration experience >> as close to first-come-first-served as reasonably achievable, but >> checking that the reference document does provide a description as set >> out below. >> (This requirement is a relaxed version of "specification required" as >> defined in {{Section 4.6 of -ianacons}}.) While examining various IANA considerations sections in this process, it also occurred to me that we didn’t say much about key values and names. So I propose (https://github.com/core-wg/core-problem-details/pull/38) to add: >> The expert is requested to assign the shortest key values (1+0 and >> 1+1 encoding) to registrations that are likely to enjoy wide use and >> can benefit from short encodings. >> >> To be immediately useful in CDDL and programming language contexts, a >> name consists of a lower-case ASCII letter (a-z) and zero or more >> additional ASCII characters that are either lower-case letters, >> digits, or a hyphen-minus, i.e., it matches [a-z][-a-z0-9]*. >> As with the key values, names need to be unique. See the whole thing in context in: https://core-wg.github.io/core-problem-details/iana-expert-instructions/draft-ietf-core-problem-details.html#name-iana-considerations (What was Section 5.1/5.2 when IANA reviewed this, now is 6.1/6.2.) Quick reactions would be useful so we can bottle this up well before today’s (1400Z) IESG meeting. Grüße, Carsten > On 15. Jun 2022, at 05:35, Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org> wrote: > > Correction to the correction: the First Come First Served registry is in Section 5.2! > > On Wed Jun 15 03:33:04 2022, amanda.baber wrote: >> Dear Authors/Chairs, >> >> We missed a detail in our Last Call review: >> >> Section 5.1 is creating a First Come First Served registry, but it >> also requires "a reference document that provides a description of the >> map, including a CDDL description, that describes all inside keys and >> values." >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-core-problem-details- >> 05#section-5.1 >> >> IANA could check that a field called "Description" exists in the >> document, but we can't confirm any details beyond that. If this >> information is required, this needs to be an Expert Review registry >> (or Specification Required, if the description in https://www.rfc- >> editor.org/rfc/rfc8126.html#section-4.6 sounds appropriate). >> >> Best regards, >> >> Amanda Baber >> IANA Operations Manager >
- Re: [core] [IANA #1232194] Ballot issued: <draft-… Carsten Bormann