IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] AD review of draft-ietf-core-resource-directory-23

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 16 April 2020 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F803A163C for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gy0z0UmTidZs for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3951E3A163B for <core@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1587041694; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=q0baJwE+jM9+k8t2TYeuPonfLbpNnCSnFWrQ+jtT2CI=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=g0SK5BGqjMCcabR1sVQYX1yuK8NcXF/3ckoFwY+kTjrp41ezTYkdhvJrDN/3ofl0DM3OOv xFhjuc3EWNe4l13WMzrMAL0d7HN/Er/S5eY6DqM7qGiyO4xf2U/KhkOXsk19wyEKSmh1pn OWDA90h44HHkKLT87lUyRWhglnr0mj4=;
Received: from [172.27.254.130] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XphVngBqwV9z@waldorf.isode.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:54:54 +0100
To: Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>
Cc: Jaime Jiménez <jaime@iki.fi>, "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Marco Tiloca <marco.tiloca@ri.se>
References: <481f9820-bcea-af6a-d5c4-d713be24d43d@isode.com> <ce656ebd-2175-682e-293f-3b81531d03d3@isode.com> <b9d767f8-341a-4c2a-b592-439b1aca6f36@www.fastmail.com> <ae660e23-e508-3b8e-9251-2e3b86aab0e0@isode.com> <20200416125142.GA3416533@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <63465eb7-0927-bbd4-df12-1299dc404c30@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:54:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1
In-Reply-To: <20200416125142.GA3416533@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/dk206Yec98Rf8OvAxWaJn8c4YdA>
Subject: Re: [core] AD review of draft-ietf-core-resource-directory-23
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 12:54:58 -0000

On 16/04/2020 13:51, Christian Amsüss wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 01:13:27PM +0100, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> sorry for the delay on this discussion. We have had a parallel
>>> thread and now I realise the discussion was not on the list nor with
>>> the ADs on it.
>> Yes, that didn't help ;-).
> neither did me missing a few points in your response over the more
> difficult topic of DNS-SD integration, which I've only just processed
> into text ready to receive a check from other authors. (At [1] in case
> you want to peek into diffs, and to be submitted as a -25 together with
> the input from Genart).
>
> [1]: https://github.com/core-wg/resource-directory/pull/242
>
>> 1) If this is not supposed to be enforcable, then the document shouldn't use
>> RFC 2119 language in this sentence, I think lowercase "should" would be much
>> better.
> That's in the proposed text now.
Your proposed changes look good. And thank you for fixing a few more 
things I reported earlier.
>> 2) This is related to my question (I believe I've asked it earlier) about
>> how security policy is going to be implemented in relationship to resource
>> directory. What are the current or expected mechanism? The document is
>> silent about that and this causes me concerns.
> I'll raise that today, along with the similar questions from the Genart
> and Secdir reviews.
>
> Thanks
> Christian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email