[core] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-new-block-13: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 21 May 2021 18:16 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietf.org
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B723A1A2E; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org, core-chairs@ietf.org, core@ietf.org, marco.tiloca@ri.se, marco.tiloca@ri.se
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.30.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <162162096651.11745.11475318344342658600@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 11:16:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/hO0rRWJ_Ko8cgWHiECxW9dRk2Fk>
Subject: [core] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-core-new-block-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 18:16:07 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-core-new-block-13: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-new-block/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for addressing my discuss and comment points! In reviewing the latest updates, I briefly tried to cross-reference the formula in section 7.2: NON_PROBING_WAIT = NON_TIMEOUT * ((2 ** NON_MAX_RETRANSMIT) - 1) * ACK_RANDOM_FACTOR + (2 * MAX_LATENCY) + NON_TIMEOUT My initial attempt found that the corresponding formulae in RFC 7252 used PROCESSING_DELAY instead of NON_TIMEOUT for the last term, but I did not go back to double-check. It's possible I'm just misreading something.
- [core] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [core] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… supjps-ietf