Re: [core] Responses to NON with 4.02

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> Wed, 17 February 2021 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <christian@amsuess.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9083A17F4 for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:27:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9do8R67Qzpkn for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:27:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prometheus.amsuess.com (alt.prometheus.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:3064::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AD533A1831 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 00:27:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010:a800:ff:fede:b1bd]) by prometheus.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6817040887; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:27:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (hermes.amsuess.com [10.13.13.254]) by poseidon-mailhub.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84C9FD; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:27:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hephaistos.amsuess.com (hephaistos.amsuess.com [IPv6:2a02:b18:c13b:8010::aa6]) by poseidon-mailbox.amsuess.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8AE6D190; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:27:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 633433 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:27:28 -0000
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:27:28 +0100
From: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ams=FCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>
To: Achim Kraus <achimkraus@gmx.net>
Cc: Core WG mailing list <core@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <YCzTcL4Yxbem1+g2@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <YCwrPuU31Kecn9K7@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <97bbdcaa-a413-22b8-b06e-49d6ed97b235@gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qzt13ntyw7gApnTF"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <97bbdcaa-a413-22b8-b06e-49d6ed97b235@gmx.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/pCxt2ihr-xBb8iojRCuZiHFZnu0>
Subject: Re: [core] Responses to NON with 4.02
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 08:27:37 -0000

Hi Achim,

> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/wd4LleVnnvt2WOXj28ouNZcCTXU/

thanks, that's indeed essentially the same question, I just failed to
find it.

I concur with Klaus that it's weird and belongs to the request/response
layer.

Just to ensure I didn't miss anything too relevant in my (so far, to be
continued) "I just pretent to be a proxy" excuse, what were the
complaints you got about the behavior about? For whatever gets upset by
your original implementation would probably also get upset by the
presence of proxies.

BR
c

-- 
To use raw power is to make yourself infinitely vulnerable to greater powers.
  -- Bene Gesserit axiom