IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Find a better name for the options

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Fri, 23 October 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B923A0ADA; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:19:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mue0sWdsEC6w; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1C23A0AD8; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 02:19:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CHdvw2j59zySd; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:19:08 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <17641_1603436697_5F928099_17641_177_5_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315657B6@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 11:19:07 +0200
Cc: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-core-new-block@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 625137547.623817-9bf221355217c07f1f6decfd2f39807e
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CAF549A4-98C6-4337-8270-C413E7948D8F@tzi.org>
References: <17641_1603436697_5F928099_17641_177_5_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315657B6@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/r5rxhqES2gqMFuBHFsmKv6sUyM0>
Subject: Re: [core] draft-ietf-core-new-block: Find a better name for the options
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:19:14 -0000

On 2020-10-23, at 09:04, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> FLLF

That would inevitably become “fluffy block-wise”.

Actually, I still thing that “tough block-wise” is most descriptive.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email