Re: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt

"Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com> Wed, 18 May 2016 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
X-Original-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: core@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FDA12D1DC for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4RvmajM4woy for <core@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-in1.interdigital.com (unknown [68.168.94.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C701F12D0A3 for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 06:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1463579756-06daaa108eaeb90001-aa7cYp
Received: from NALENITE.InterDigital.com (nalenite.interdigital.com [10.2.64.253]) by smtp-in1.interdigital.com with ESMTP id zSbifbrjiyXNNyGs (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <core@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:55:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com
Received: from NABESITE.InterDigital.com ([fe80::4d8a:a889:67c2:f009]) by NALENITE.InterDigital.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Wed, 18 May 2016 09:55:57 -0400
From: "Rahman, Akbar" <Akbar.Rahman@InterDigital.com>
To: "cabo@tzi.org" <cabo@tzi.org>, "jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com" <jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRrR0WzJNnBq5QE0q4cwryK3YZrp+24c9ggAfdY7A=
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:55:56 +0000
Message-ID: <36F5869FE31AB24485E5E3222C288E1F5BABBC1B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
References: <20160513134033.10520.69223.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <36F5869FE31AB24485E5E3222C288E1F5BAB947B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
In-Reply-To: <36F5869FE31AB24485E5E3222C288E1F5BAB947B@NABESITE.InterDigital.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.3.2.107]
x-exclaimer-md-config: bb79a19d-f711-475c-a0f9-4d93b71c94dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: nalenite.interdigital.com[10.2.64.253]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1463579757
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.1.245.3:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 3990
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at interdigital.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.29692 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/core/sCghXxMOuWlDFtl5jKZDKXIMMVc>
Cc: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt
X-BeenThere: core@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Constrained RESTful Environments \(CoRE\) Working Group list" <core.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/core/>
List-Post: <mailto:core@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core>, <mailto:core-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 13:56:05 -0000

Hi Carsten/Jamie,


Just resending this email as I believe the first time it did not get correctly to Carsten due to some problem with my mail server.  I've been told by me IST department that the problem has now been fixed so I am resending this request to re-start the WGLC.


Thanks,


Akbar

-----Original Message-----
From: core [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rahman, Akbar
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:51 AM
To: cabo@tzi.org; jaime.jimenez@ericsson.com
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt

Hi Carsten/Jaime,


We have updated the draft to cover the following:


 Changes from ietf-09 to ietf-10:

 o  Addressed Ticket #401 - Clarified that draft covers not only
    Reverse HC Proxy but that many parts also apply to Forward and
    Interception Proxies.

 o  Clarified that draft concentrates on the HTTP-to-CoAP mapping
    direction (i.e. the HC proxy is a HTTP server and a CoAP client).

 o  Clarified the "null mapping" case where no CoAP URI information is
    embedded in the HTTP request URI.

 o  Moved multicast related security text to the "Security
    Considerations" to consolidate all security information in one
    location.

 o  Removed references to "placement" of proxy (e.g. server-side vs
    client-side) as is confusing and provides little added value.

 o  Fixed version numbers on references that were corrupted in last
    revision due to outdated xml2rfc conversion tool local cache.

 o  Various editorial improvements.


Can you please review, and start the 2nd WGLC if you think that everything looks in order.


Best Regards,


Akbar

-----Original Message-----
From: core [mailto:core-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 9:41 AM
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: core@ietf.org
Subject: [core] I-D Action: draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Constrained RESTful Environments of the IETF.

      Title           : Guidelines for HTTP-to-CoAP Mapping Implementations
      Authors         : Angelo P. Castellani
                        Salvatore Loreto
                        Akbar Rahman
                        Thomas Fossati
                        Esko Dijk
      Filename        : draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10.txt
      Pages           : 36
      Date            : 2016-05-13

Abstract:
 This document provides reference information for implementing a
 cross-protocol network proxy that performs translation from the HTTP
 protocol to the CoAP protocol.  This will enable a HTTP client to
 access resources on a CoAP server through the proxy.  This document
 describes how a HTTP request is mapped to a CoAP request, and then
 how a CoAP response is mapped back to a HTTP response.  This includes
 guidelines for URI mapping, media type mapping and additional proxy
 implementation issues.  This document covers the Reverse, Forward and
 Interception cross-protocol proxy cases.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-10


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
core mailing list
core@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core

_______________________________________________
core mailing list
core@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core