Re: [core] 🔔 CoRE Working Group Adoption call for draft-hartke-t2trg-coral-09 and draft-hartke-t2trg-ciri-03

Dear all,

I have reviewed the two documents and support their adoption.

Regards,
Alexander

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:01 AM Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
wrote:

> I have read both drafts in detail and fully support adopting them.
>
> Cheers,
> Ari
>
> > On 16 Jul 2019, at 22.12, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> >
> > In Prague, we said we were going to adopt the two base CoRAL
> specifications (which are currently marked as T2TRG drafts) as CoRE working
> group items.  We didn’t do the validation on the mailing list yet, which
> this working group adoption call is about.
> >
> > Among other things, the adoption of these drafts is intended to fill the
> hole left when we put draft-ietf-core-links-json on hold.  So if you want
> to comment on the WG adoption, please also keep this aspect in mind, even
> if it could also be handled in a more orthogonal way (which you could
> recommend).
> >
> > This starts a one-week working group adoption call.
> > (Normally we wouldn’t run a WG call that partially overlaps an IETF, but
> this time there is plenty of opportunity to think about CoRAL during the
> IETF, including the hackathon and the side meeting on core applications
> before the first of our two WG meetings.)
> >
> > This is a formal call for adoption of draft-hartke-t2trg-coral-09 and
> draft-hartke-t2trg-ciri-03 as WG documents of the CoRE WG.
> > If you have read the drafts and support adopting them, please say so.
> > If you see a problem with adopting them as a WG document, please tell us.
> > For both, remember that WG adoption does not mean that we already have
> consensus on all the details(*), just that this is the right working
> document to address the issue (and that we should address the issue in the
> first place); you are encouraged to mention any issues that you already
> know.
> > Please respond to core@ietf.org, or exceptionally to
> core-chairs@ietf.org (for off-list comments).
> >
> > This formal WG adoption call runs until the end of July 23rd so we can
> pick up the results at the CoRE meeting on July 25th.
> >
> > Grüße, Carsten
> >
> > (*) the most bikeshed issue (also relevant for the new draft name)
> appears to be whether CIRIs, which aren’t really IRIs that much, should
> rather be called CoRIs or maybe CRIs or even something completely
> different.  Please comment on this most important branding issue under
> https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=580aff0b-04def502-580abf90-86740465fc08-e4c236255ccab7e3&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fektrah%2Fcoral%2Fissues%2F18
> if you care.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > core mailing list
> > core@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>