Re: [core] 🔔 Working Group Adoption call for draft-groves-core-dynlink

[Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jaime,

I missed this call for adoption. I am in favor of having the document
adopted for 2 reasons:

1) First, the content of this draft was contained in the
draft-ietf-core-interfaces-05. For this reason I am actually wondering
why we do a call for adoption in the first place since we are only doing
a document management action here (separating the content into two
documents).

2) Second, as Christian already mentioned the functionality is part of
the LWM2M version 1.0 specification and we would prefer to have a
corresponding IETF document.

Ciao
Hannes


On 08/15/2016 05:05 PM, Jaime Jiménez wrote:
> Dear CoRE-WG,
> 
> As we discussed at last IETF96, working group adoption has been
> requested for draft-groves-core-dynlink. This draft is the result of a
> document split and thus the initial status is that of adoption,
> nevertheless that has to be confirmed on the list. Please reply with
> your comments, including although not limited to whether or not you
> support adoption. Non-authors are especially encouraged to comment.
> 
> Since there are several concurrent WGA calls, we will end the call
> on *August 26, 2016*.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jaime and Carsten
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
>