[COSE] Amendments to the minutes

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sat, 21 November 2015 06:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BB91A875C for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:40:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hdsUt9Tr8BK9 for <cose@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.pacifier.net (smtp4.pacifier.net [64.255.237.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8192D1A875D for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hebrews (c-24-21-96-37.hsd1.or.comcast.net [24.21.96.37]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jimsch@nwlink.com) by smtp4.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B004F38F16 for <cose@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:40:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: cose@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:37:45 -0800
Message-ID: <019101d12427$21d7a480$6586ed80$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Thread-Index: AdEkJi7TZxDFBS0ORAimXmHE5rUJMw==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cose/J0GeWSjl4PJVwsBqFgZQnDAdq2A>
Subject: [COSE] Amendments to the minutes
X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption <cose.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cose/>
List-Post: <mailto:cose@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose>, <mailto:cose-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 06:40:36 -0000

First:  Thanks Hannes they have been useful to me.

Small changes:

OLD:
Carsten: Kathleen says for a very good reason for having RSA1.5 being
          included. It shouldn't be included in new protocol.

NEW:
Carsten: Kathleen says there needs to be a very good reason for having
RSA1.5 being
          included. It shouldn't be included in new protocol.

Actual jabber comment:

[07:01:34] <Kathleen Moriarty> mic: I'd like to see a very good reason for
it if RSA v1.5 is included
[07:01:55] <Kathleen Moriarty> shouldn't be in new protocols

OLD:
Sean: We need to keep this simpler her.
NEW:
Sean: We need to keep this simple here.

OLD:
Issue#23: Is 'keyops' sufficient or should we add a 'use' field (which
          was added for the W3C).
NEW:
Issue#23: Is 'keyops' sufficient or should we add back the 'use' field from
JOSE (keyops was added for the W3C).