Re: [Crisp] new status for DREG2

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:16:07AM -0500, Andrew Newton wrote:
> I had a meeting with an sTLD operator last week where it was brought  
> to my attention that they would like to mark domains with a status  
> indicating compliance with regulations not directly related to the  
> actual domain registration process... as in, they have conducted a  
> compliance check and have found that a domain holder's web site meets  
> certain accessibility requirements or internationalization  
> requirements, etc...

Hmm.  I've seen proposed a case where the policy is actually
many-valued: compliant, noncompliant, and N/A, for instance.
Trademarks are a good case: if the domain is created during one
period, the trademark has either been checked or not, but if the
domain is created after that period, nobody cares about the
trademark.  I suppose one could argue that the "don't care" case is
compliant anyway, but what about a <policy:> status with <name:>
substatus and <compliance:> substatus?  Maybe that's overengineering.

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@ca.afilias.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                        +1 416 646 3304 x4110

_______________________________________________
Crisp mailing list
Crisp@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/crisp