Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: CPace

[Karthik Bhargavan <[e-mail]>]

Apologies for the delay. Will review it this week from the protocol
viewpoint.

On Fri, Jan 12, 2024, 07:08 Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Karthik,
>
> Any news with the review?
>
> Regards,
> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 12:00 PM Karthikeyan Bhargavan <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Ok. I will put this on my stack.
>>
>> All my best,
>> Karthik
>>
>> On 11 Oct 2023, at 10:56, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Bjoern, Karthik and Thomas,
>>
>> The chairs would like to ask each of you to review the CPace draft,
>> "CPace, a balanced composable PAKE", draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace-10 (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace/).
>>
>> There were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early versions of the
>> draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
>> There were several important questions in those reviews which had to be
>> addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG: some of them are
>> underlined in the following paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/839.pdf –
>> we would like to ask you to pay special attention to these issues.
>>
>> It would be great if you could do it before the middle of November.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 10:51 AM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> We still need reviewers (three or four) for the CPace draft.
>>>
>>> Since CPace was a winner of the PAKE selection process, we have to be
>>> 100% sure that all concerns have been properly addressed.
>>>
>>> Bjoern, Russ, Karthik, we will be happy to receive reviews from you
>>> (taking into account your reviews provided during the PAKE Selection
>>> process).
>>>
>>> Chloe, Julia, Jean-Philippe, Scott, if some of you could review the
>>> CPace draft, despite the fact that you've just reviewed the OPAQUE draft
>>> (thanks a lot once again for this!), that would be amazing as well.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:17 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <
>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Crypto Panel Experts,
>>>>
>>>> The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide three (or
>>>> more) reviews for the CPace draft, "CPace, a balanced composable PAKE",
>>>> draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace-10 (
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace/).
>>>>
>>>> The CPace protocol was selected as a result of the PAKE selection
>>>> process in CFRG (as well as the OPAQUE protocol which has recently been
>>>> reviewed by the Panel).
>>>>
>>>> There were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early versions of
>>>> the draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
>>>> There were several important questions in those reviews which had to be
>>>> addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG: some of them are
>>>> underlined in the following paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/839.pdf
>>>>
>>>> Hence we would like to ask the reviewers to pay a lot of attention to
>>>> reviewing this draft, trying to take into account as many considerations
>>>> provided in the previous reviews as possible.
>>>>
>>>> Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG Chairs)
>>>>
>>>
>>