IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Crypto-panel] Request for review: CPace

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Mon, 25 September 2023 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA31C14CE33 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id emxaFptiGl7G for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BBEC1519A0 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2d.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-d7ecdb99b7aso7045813276.3 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695644251; x=1696249051; darn=irtf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3Q6p1bBhrREMJgi/PdekPKG1K2doN30ARnkuv5Fcyno=; b=lWgmnuHY5+bbCkeaRRUaBX6rpuzaAx3x+zx3TZPyy3g/s+svBgUpOZxrsccLw5LvKQ 3F0hn5dgkS+OTMdXA6bSyLQrazoL2OmYqIkRBNHg2+BrQeO15CO8+VW9z7XmwEaBmd8y 8JZ22Y3Jpbm6cOfF+nhkhjxNW3e7vhN3ffA3qNdrHpNwxRWNMbVF4zVbUh22ksJA+4kK 9Eq/bvxOOEp2lIARjP/nDExdTRV/Z/rWZq+ESMKgDTUE30/MJyS7ErNM/jPbBTSr0pRG cesnMdeD07t5LfgshOcY/pHL3wd44WGNybzEXxvs7S7ELt1Opoxjnx5gGFUKlU6PM3aY Op3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695644251; x=1696249051; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3Q6p1bBhrREMJgi/PdekPKG1K2doN30ARnkuv5Fcyno=; b=frB9fmmHM/iAUuzrmvFMaNmRqw+Py0CMF5qI/d9W6Myyi+Z1qi44b+yfpdTPDrE3zA TYPExOYJsEl+PlOS8TlBrRBK2kM/Fo1021QJ60cHBca7JFYhuFGwTsinKVwwGAjEry85 I/SEJ0qMqS4UPLeLBUYGNDdtqmhWw4JFOUYaG5ENH9s9OQZ1Hm8IJjiL+lIlIl60XU0A +cjp4lCrqG0tAxJdj/Q8/Bsx8Z1ENqdETHK3yq/KixVWt/zqPLCDNVQXrzqGhyefCWCL sUPWSAmMsAYyU436Nyz56IOnGBSAi6m93x+PbBbGri003UwdJAmBJZMHpPmo22FlOjr4 /rvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrzAtYo1exHcHyGugD2V2ySYENlRGkFEW/b3zsAxIBkbJh1iLQ H5grMg9j5JgfYPyUAMqJWfRniFStpBsIctj8BJvHhH6g5RQWft6O
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGG8I+NYtjpklHqfz/HdkdhxwSCGk55GizKJjoenD4tvA64T2TBmD1zi1WtPVpBCBSJrbqjdpoyEoVqQEQLum8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:ae0c:0:b0:d78:f32:5849 with SMTP id a12-20020a25ae0c000000b00d780f325849mr5362783ybj.24.1695644251340; Mon, 25 Sep 2023 05:17:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:17:20 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6kAW_rEK3_7Y64nU=-DP=7JjXM-oiX1XB+_973yP+pf0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: crypto-panel@irtf.org
Cc: draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace@ietf.org, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004444b906062df198"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/ZQ5Asb9Xgr_a5E-UxG6DmOCNWkY>
Subject: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: CPace
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Review Panel review coordination <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 12:17:37 -0000

Dear Crypto Panel Experts,

The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide three (or more)
reviews for the CPace draft, "CPace, a balanced composable PAKE",
draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace-10 (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-cpace/).

The CPace protocol was selected as a result of the PAKE selection process
in CFRG (as well as the OPAQUE protocol which has recently been reviewed by
the Panel).

There were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early versions of the
draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
There were several important questions in those reviews which had to be
addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG: some of them are
underlined in the following paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/839.pdf

Hence we would like to ask the reviewers to pay a lot of attention to
reviewing this draft, trying to take into account as many considerations
provided in the previous reviews as possible.

Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG Chairs)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email