IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Crypto-panel] Last (I hope) review request of draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 03 January 2024 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFBEC14F6F4 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:38:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iwxAce2-DozK for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C95C14F6A9 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:38:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E62D4AE3; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:38:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8211D5287; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:38:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <45B7A38D-7221-4B1F-BBFE-4614F15B5B54@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_038A8F28-7063-4711-A620-4EC2BE02F252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 11:38:09 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CH0PR11MB5444C72AF76071FCF5D86FD2C160A@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>, "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>, "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>, Quynh Dang <quynh.dang@nist.gov>
To: Scott Fluhrer <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
References: <CH0PR11MB544458D3F4F2EBAB3878E47BC193A@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMr0u6k2tin5UNuBUxMEwyEmGBF06gZOPj+w_6Dq9gKAC4d_jw@mail.gmail.com> <345786EE-F5A7-4F78-A38A-3E8D35E98A02@vigilsec.com> <CH0PR11MB5444C72AF76071FCF5D86FD2C160A@CH0PR11MB5444.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/r6xMjAHzHPJ-u1T8TbB0uNamZ2A>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Last (I hope) review request of draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Crypto Review Panel review coordination <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 16:38:26 -0000

All of thise changes seem fine to me.

Russ

> On Jan 3, 2024, at 9:38 AM, Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Could you at least look at the diffs from the version you did review (https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets-10&url2=draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets-11&difftype=--html) and verify that none of the changes modify your review?
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com <mailto:housley@vigilsec.com>> 
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 11:19 AM
> To: Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com <mailto:smyshsv@gmail.com>>
> Cc: Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer@cisco.com <mailto:sfluhrer@cisco.com>>; crypto-panel@irtf.org <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>; cfrg-chairs@ietf.org <mailto:cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>; Quynh Dang <quynh.dang@nist.gov <mailto:quynh.dang@nist.gov>>
> Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Last (I hope) review request of draft-fluhrer-lms-more-parm-sets
>  
> I have reviewed and implemented this document.  I cannot add value by doing so again.
>  
> Russ
>  
> 
> 
> On Dec 18, 2023, at 8:07 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com <mailto:smyshsv@gmail.com>> wrote:
>  
> Dear Crypto Panel experts,
>  
> Any volunteers to check the changes in the draft?
>  
> Regards,
> Stanislav (for CFRG chairs)
>  
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 11:46 PM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer@cisco.com <mailto:sfluhrer@cisco.com>> wrote:
> I’m trying to put this one to bed, and apparently, it needs a final review.
>  
> I did make an update in September (to address review comments I got, mostly adding explanations and a bit of word-smithing) – could someone please look at it, and see if there’s anything unacceptable?
>  
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org <mailto:Crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email