IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Curdle] Some work for the group

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Fri, 09 December 2016 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F408D1297BC for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:42:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xacqD6oqImSi for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D7C129480 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 08:42:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9940300278 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:31:48 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id m4l1XWKQPqRY for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:31:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-45-101-150.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.45.101.150]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F4D23000E6; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:31:46 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5BA5675E-7A07-4A65-B23C-0472FF09D943"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ada1784daf4349afae3ec29414bb4444@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 11:42:01 -0500
Message-Id: <7F982A95-C7D3-408F-8B1D-D2F5F21CD166@vigilsec.com>
References: <ada1784daf4349afae3ec29414bb4444@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/B_gWKogSUBMxhxgAu700-Y6XWUE>
Cc: "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Some work for the group
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:42:09 -0000

> The text in draft-ietf-curdle-pkix says CA’s MUST NOT use pre-hash version of signatures.  Does anyone object to this?  There is a mention of the trade-offs in doing that at the end of section 5.  Please respond within a week.

 	
draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures is aligned with this decision.  If it changes in one of the documents, it needs to change in both.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email