Re: [Curdle] Review of draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-05

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Niclas:

Thanks for taking that time to review the document.

> Reviewer: Niclas Comstedt
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
> ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
> IESG.  These comments were written with the intent of improving the
> operational aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not
> addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG
> review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments
> just like any other last call comments.
> 
> Document reviewed: draft-ietf-curdle-cms-chacha20-poly1305-05
> 
> Background: I reviewed 04 and found only minor nits.
> 
> Summary: Minor nit and incorrect reference
> 
> - Section 3, still need the 2nd must to all capitals in the following
> sentence 
> "The AlgorithmIdentifier parameters field MUST be present, and the
> parameters field must contain a AEADChaCha20Poly1305Nonce:”

Yes.  I’m pleased to make that change.

> - Section 6. First paragraph references RFC7534 as if its the same as
> [FORIETF]. I think the RFC is a typo (and that actual RFC is
> unrelated). So either needs the corrected RFC or remove that and keep
> referencing only [FORIETF].

I cannot find a reference to RFC 7534.  I see a reference to RFC 7539, which is the correct RFC.

Russ