Re: [Curdle] comments on draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-03.txt

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Fri, 07 April 2017 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848A8129583 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8OrNfW5lBAeO for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3D45129553 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g2so73140103pge.3 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wSwT+Lpase2HE9y/RKb4AtM+lkFDoKMTMTotWRhATH4=; b=lHTAEk44t3QuU7CzkkcpAI6zaHMq9xsPEVmPvi3ebUGcA4vzDwJtGVjM7ngoqDhdJm jH6MVy0of+SGPyhWvhB4NpT2czqXXrB5U+UYjOus+KCCzUb3c2uudKkhUm3Swm58Pxn3 Ky15mP8j1eNLANig1n3XLyUWydYMPCQ44c2882Wrqf1dBTj06bQgYa3uPzeWNi+PjHXM hwFQh/ECCGJ39KiuuEn0K2FCKlx8HKQGlWdWRo9A3B36JxTLUgNdi5hrvl6JzudjXLi7 e5Q1rcGZ9fMEZaL5fof2irlPw6HAXt7NVKqw5DHO3LbZW6IFCGLJzW9rwCPD4V7ZHNQM siJw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wSwT+Lpase2HE9y/RKb4AtM+lkFDoKMTMTotWRhATH4=; b=ie7gLgObDacWhuRgpVCbSXaFPHiNIJxiHcw7kYW0gIaft94FpIzXQaCEcBg2i7Nja/ qFHC+s9l2gSL7iCdFXWRHLoeAQX9uNBM3JTDDnk8oQIux7/rgmXAoP9ifx6I+sIN5g3w lG8x075wvdh9AkAftb2VjCO7r8nMRt+s3Q0S/4Rncd1BHUn1I1jLxS10Lc0ECCZFpZaW lFKfpDaCidNkKyK/06y8qMacODPuxW4X9/j0hWAxpB2OYYdIGfzJHUjT6cnfbiN2vJGe o2A/76r6JM1WumV358vYm1tQnJsg8J2ywYlx0c4uMZGhktQu1iIF/CBertlFBUEVjFTm nhPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3sxRK/v5JNuWZ2lZE9YqeJfIwtbLnhatwjOuqKDR9lLRiG54IGQhCwvGTVm1S3FUjh051nQAlAsp4DQg==
X-Received: by 10.84.231.9 with SMTP id f9mr50670696plk.191.1491591006427; Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:50:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.160.194 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 11:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTk=r9quAZxvyQgLd7PrvvhzoQ96s5CPqHcFNaGez8igYcw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADPMZDByTiWov0vp2Tk1n9dnnkfwepO+UsAnh3rdsrbem2H=VQ@mail.gmail.com> <1490575901696.39454@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <CADPMZDDNZTznKBJ2-vf4MJFjP0Bx34ALF8JCVBhwv12Pdm=XcA@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTk=L2mKheNkHQ+jtecspLnR2rGc1BajkTKQ0G3cynxkwow@mail.gmail.com> <20170327072447.GA2827@LK-Perkele-V2.elisa-laajakaista.fi> <CADPMZDAmuUKy_AJ9aYd4YYAmO5ZU-8z0P7EZwq2aG+jJM-kRaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTk=r9quAZxvyQgLd7PrvvhzoQ96s5CPqHcFNaGez8igYcw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 11:50:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=62mYoYm5MMBK5WKXQjffFBrHDd1EgOZ7vo-JkDgg+Dw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Cc: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>, "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>, Ilari Liusvaara <ilariliusvaara@welho.com>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/hpvP5VJY68004XErmWmM4kTaduc>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] comments on draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-03.txt
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 18:50:10 -0000

On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Daniel Migault
<daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the chicago meeting [1], the consensus seems that even though pss would
> be defined, there is no plane to implement nor to use it. I am confirming
> this consensus on the mailing list. If you desagree with that, please raise
> your opinion. If not we will move the draft forward.

I strongly object. PKCS 1.5 signature verification has a long and
inglorious history of exploitation. PSS does not. Ideally everyone
would have used FDH or equivalently strong signatures, with simple
verification, but that didn't happen.