[Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1352933] Request for Assignment (cwt, CTA-5009)

David Dong via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> Fri, 09 February 2024 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B72C14F68F for <cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:55:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.937
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.937 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JceEnI8XDAeU for <cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D30EC14F614 for <cwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F64E177A; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 00:55:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 119D060EB4; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 00:55:47 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: david.dong
From: David Dong via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-1120500-1706811579-1286.1352933-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1352933@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1105131-1706036360-972.1352933-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-96475-1706118980-1994.1352933-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-1120500-1706811579-1286.1352933-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-822229-1707440146-615.1352933-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1352933
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: david.dong@iana.org
CC: michael_b_jones@hotmail.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com, ludwig.seitz@combitech.com, cwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1707440146-822229-30"
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:55:46 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cwt-reg-review/B40c7AtG9N_r1ubd2dWCEhRQSOg>
Subject: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1352933] Request for Assignment (cwt, CTA-5009)
X-BeenThere: cwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: CWT Registry Review <cwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cwt-reg-review>, <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:cwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cwt-reg-review>, <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2024 00:55:52 -0000

Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-review)

Following up on this; as the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration proposal below? If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/

The CTA-5009 specification is attached.

Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act one week after the first response we receive.

The due date is February 14th.

With thanks,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist


On Thu Feb 01 18:19:39 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-
> review)
> 
> Following up on this; as the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token
> (CWT) Claims registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration
> proposal below? If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/
> 
> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act one week
> after the first response we receive.
> 
> The due date is February 14th.
> 
> With thanks,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> 
> On Wed Jan 24 17:56:20 2024, david.dong wrote:
> > Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-
> > review)
> >
> > As the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims
> > registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration proposal below?
> > If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/
> >
> > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we’ll act one week
> > after the first response we receive.
> >
> > The due date is February 14th.
> >
> > With thanks,
> >
> > David Dong
> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> >
> > On Tue Jan 23 18:59:20 2024, david.dong wrote:
> > > Contact Name:
> > > Chris Lemmons
> > >
> > > Contact Email:
> > > alficles@gmail.com
> > >
> > > Type of Assignment:
> > > Permanent
> > >
> > > Registry:
> > > CBOR Tag, JSON Web Token Claims, CBOR Web Token Claims
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > These tags and claims are defined in CTA-5009, which was recently
> > > published by the Consumer Technology Association. The specification
> > > is
> > > available free of charge at
> > > https://shop.cta.tech/collections/standards/products/fast-and-
> > > readable-geographical-hashing-cta-5009 , but a courtesy copy can be
> > > provided to IANA and any relevant experts on request if desired.
> > >
> > > Additional Info:
> > > These are defined in CTA-5009 as noted above. These define tags and
> > > claims for the storage of Geohash strings and arrays. As described
> > > in
> > > the document:
> > >
> > > Show quoted text
> > > article on Wikipedia. These are excellent resources, but they can
> > > change over time
> > > and are not generally suitable for building on in a consensus-based
> > > standards-making process.
> > > This document exists to remediate that. It describes the practice
> > > as
> > > it exists at the time of writing and
> > > provides general, straightforward algorithms for understanding and
> > > communicating with Geohashes. It
> > > also exists to serve as a stable reference document for a few IANA
> > > registrations.
> > >
> > > To that end, we request these numbers:
> > >
> > > CBOR Tag:
> > >
> > > Tag: 105
> > > Data Item: text string or array
> > > Semantics: Geohash String
> > > Point of Contact: Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > Tag: 279
> > > Data Item: array
> > > Semantics: Coordinate Reference System Wrapper
> > > Point of Contact: Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > JWT Claim:
> > >
> > > Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Description: Geohash String or Array
> > > Change Controller: Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > CWT Claim:
> > >
> > > Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Description: Geohash String
> > > JWT Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Key: 282
> > > Claim Value Type(s): text string or array
> > > Change Controller: Consumer Technology Association