Re: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1352933] Request for Assignment (cwt, CTA-5009)

[Michael Jones <[e-mail]>]

I am OK with the proposed CWT Claim registration.

                                -- Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 4:56 PM
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [IANA #1352933] Request for Assignment (cwt, CTA-5009)

Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-review)

Following up on this; as the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration proposal below? If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/cwt/

The CTA-5009 specification is attached.

Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we'll act one week after the first response we receive.

The due date is February 14th.

With thanks,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist


On Thu Feb 01 18:19:39 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-
> review)
>
> Following up on this; as the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token
> (CWT) Claims registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration
> proposal below? If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:
>
> https://www.i/
> ana.org%2Fassignments%2Fcwt%2F&data=05%7C02%7C%7Ce1eb0a42645c4166d6890
> 8dc2909da95%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C6384303698045
> 14490%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
> TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=KMZAYZHqSlkCLjw9ANIBshRx
> zLj0Z0hxdq6nfWTdFyc%3D&reserved=0
>
> Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we'll act one week
> after the first response we receive.
>
> The due date is February 14th.
>
> With thanks,
>
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
>
> On Wed Jan 24 17:56:20 2024, david.dong wrote:
> > Dear Mike Jones, Hannes Tschofenig, and Ludwig Seitz (cc: cwt-reg-
> > review)
> >
> > As the designated experts for the CBOR Web Token (CWT) Claims
> > registry, can you review the CWT Claims registration proposal below?
> > If it's OK, we'll make the assignment at:
> >
> > https://www/
> > .iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fcwt%2F&data=05%7C02%7C%7Ce1eb0a42645c4166d
> > 68908dc2909da95%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C6384303
> > 69804519979%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
> > MzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lPI6gu0fdcgZG6
> > OrnS2lTu0hn0500paJEcXMxW7X1Ug%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Unless you ask us to wait for the other reviewers, we'll act one
> > week after the first response we receive.
> >
> > The due date is February 14th.
> >
> > With thanks,
> >
> > David Dong
> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> >
> > On Tue Jan 23 18:59:20 2024, david.dong wrote:
> > > Contact Name:
> > > Chris Lemmons
> > >
> > > Contact Email:
> > > [e-mail]
> > >
> > > Type of Assignment:
> > > Permanent
> > >
> > > Registry:
> > > CBOR Tag, JSON Web Token Claims, CBOR Web Token Claims
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > These tags and claims are defined in CTA-5009, which was recently
> > > published by the Consumer Technology Association. The
> > > specification is available free of charge at
> > > https://s/
> > > hop.cta.tech%2Fcollections%2Fstandards%2Fproducts%2Ffast-and-&data
> > > =05%7C02%7C%7Ce1eb0a42645c4166d68908dc2909da95%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb
> > > 435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638430369804524353%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
> > > 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0
> > > %3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NEMvlPjQ9Fl0tLHFYNfv85h25H04B%2BV0DSR5oDh%2
> > > BKew%3D&reserved=0
> > > readable-geographical-hashing-cta-5009 , but a courtesy copy can
> > > be provided to IANA and any relevant experts on request if desired.
> > >
> > > Additional Info:
> > > These are defined in CTA-5009 as noted above. These define tags
> > > and claims for the storage of Geohash strings and arrays. As
> > > described in the document:
> > >
> > > Show quoted text
> > > article on Wikipedia. These are excellent resources, but they can
> > > change over time and are not generally suitable for building on in
> > > a consensus-based standards-making process.
> > > This document exists to remediate that. It describes the practice
> > > as it exists at the time of writing and provides general,
> > > straightforward algorithms for understanding and communicating
> > > with Geohashes. It also exists to serve as a stable reference
> > > document for a few IANA registrations.
> > >
> > > To that end, we request these numbers:
> > >
> > > CBOR Tag:
> > >
> > > Tag: 105
> > > Data Item: text string or array
> > > Semantics: Geohash String
> > > Point of Contact: Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > Tag: 279
> > > Data Item: array
> > > Semantics: Coordinate Reference System Wrapper Point of Contact:
> > > Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > JWT Claim:
> > >
> > > Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Description: Geohash String or Array Change Controller:
> > > Consumer Technology Association
> > >
> > > CWT Claim:
> > >
> > > Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Description: Geohash String
> > > JWT Claim Name: geohash
> > > Claim Key: 282
> > > Claim Value Type(s): text string or array Change Controller:
> > > Consumer Technology Association