IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dance] call for adoption for

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 28 February 2022 04:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C01D93A093A for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:36:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n0lVvC5FQOLT for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676C13A0938 for <dance@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:36:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id v22so15705729ljh.7 for <dance@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:36:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Nrg3U/PJ4aMNL2hV39h6j9Dh3TTgj365Mtf40i1/VZc=; b=h9inh7zlk0n8iu5tU9MgfbomI3J1ZAALNccZFi5sxQdw9+JZgO1y5HZrxGsT6k1UHG b8T6UHxbvRBrvWIXknMzxjAuJO9tGc2oiJV+FOgZV/ySDPkL2minStLVqXTfuD3Cc/4u 3DcxikHcFojd/7WtHzeZ4mB//5v5DNgrksig1xtEjD4v+2L/Kney0De7Cga4gg0a+AMC /jm2MBokgboBgucX0kZY4Cvbue8cHoErkiqZb4HdafDugoBmY88GS1eWx+DaiIP7aso7 W9pmm2lGbhekUab0gzJaFIfJRA9tK1yezuXnJ9q3FUiF0M+LKAcXDlieozTsmJhGViH+ GSiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nrg3U/PJ4aMNL2hV39h6j9Dh3TTgj365Mtf40i1/VZc=; b=heTP8b889hVaMP75BSLIa26dMlv+hzqb8jnaYup9n9tQ0BIB237zkBURlcv3y21nSA up49kQ1CwkxwbY65hLu9m5YYVe+R1//0u34Bnw/oMQx1S7N7vhQkZT4sA0MVUVdB4Bvd OcCb+PujAnIO3wrE4tQykxcvTLUWSzl6JQ+bBO+R2xVOIwa3WC+LaucfEVnDK5H28+xP G70mzpQJqID8zjaGz0Ghp0SWxelZ0rYhDa4JUHhS0417OvkPihdovetuzy7lhh6C8kFG ogIhBcKzsrv9aL1FkbzOjdIF6J4746+FyyuojeanrxMQdvXc2KJX1sfdD6gvL/56U4G5 PlCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sBmr0DIqoBaOxXgIfYXZwSAhd2zdEnJ90XJs2eBwWMolTLFJ9 dcFfBdbQ834cSTedZ8y+8s+pTkNDp2ienmdVOB51As3azFs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdgoxd7gXoLWtggf8y//7n+IY2Rg929p2BFdD+sia4j4VqSw3xesEuy1HtTpw/QD07Qq+jz1sGnkH2wka7b0A=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3c0b:0:b0:245:f5f8:3f4a with SMTP id j11-20020a2e3c0b000000b00245f5f83f4amr12893271lja.483.1646022981437; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:36:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ybly21z3j12.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <ybly21z3j12.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:36:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GmMFv2CHSFNMBgRUfyeaU3GPKp3pbUcYuqb1NX9y5QpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dance@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000019c9cb05d90c973f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/4ovlZIu5DrLx3lSZ-AENep4iYTM>
Subject: Re: [Dance] call for adoption for
X-BeenThere: dance@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE Authentication for Network Clients Everywhere <dance.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dance/>
List-Post: <mailto:dance@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:36:28 -0000

I favor adoption of draft-huque-tls-dane-clientid and it makes sense to
adopt
these in Dance, for the reasons that Paul stated about DANE related TLS
drafts.

tim


On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:08 PM Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> wrote:

>
> During IETF 112 the DANCE participants indicated
> draft-huque-tls-dane-clientid was potentially ready for adoption.  I
> started a 3-week call for adoption today, ending just before IETF 113.
>
> We'd like to hear support for those in favor of adoption, and whether
> you'll commit to participating in discussions about it and helping
> review the document.
>
> NOTE: it is unclear if this is the right working group to publish
> this under, or if it should advance in the TLS working group instead as
> it is an extension to TLS.  Though we discussed adopting it during 112,
> we didn't discuss where it should go forward.  A possible reason to not
> adopt this document in DANCE is that you believe it should belong in TLS
> instead.  Please indicate your preference if you respond to this call.
>
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> USC/ISI
>
> --
> Dance mailing list
> Dance@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email