IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dance] [EXT] Re: call for adoption for

Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca> Tue, 01 March 2022 18:47 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=0052b2787f=jacques.latour@cira.ca>
X-Original-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87083A09EE for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:47:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9HVRHgX3e5Jf for <dance@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:47:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-relay04-hz10.hornetsecurity.com (mx-relay04-hz10.hornetsecurity.com [108.163.133.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CAEB3A09D6 for <dance@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 10:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nat.crp.cira.ca ([192.228.22.11]) by mx-relay04-hz10.hornetsecurity.com; Tue, 01 Mar 2022 13:47:40 -0500
Received: from CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA (10.2.36.121) by CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA (10.2.36.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.2242.12; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:47:36 -0500
Received: from CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA ([fe80::2987:945f:b043:977b]) by CRP-EX16-02.CORP.CIRA.CA ([fe80::2987:945f:b043:977b%14]) with mapi id 15.01.2242.012; Tue, 1 Mar 2022 13:47:36 -0500
From: Jacques Latour <Jacques.Latour@cira.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
CC: "dance@ietf.org" <dance@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [EXT] Re: [Dance] call for adoption for
Thread-Index: AQHYLEeaYJO/52NBH0qYuwvuH5vJHKyq4Mfw
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 18:47:36 +0000
Message-ID: <70b4eb6b0e0f4554850863b6e1eebee6@cira.ca>
References: <ybly21z3j12.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <cb8cc267-3476-60a3-117b-415a6fe0e060@nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <cb8cc267-3476-60a3-117b-415a6fe0e060@nohats.ca>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.2.36.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-cloud-security-sender: jacques.latour@cira.ca
X-cloud-security-recipient: dance@ietf.org
X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN
X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mx-relay04-hz10.hornetsecurity.com with C159D13600A9
X-cloud-security-connect: nat.crp.cira.ca[192.228.22.11], TLS=1, IP=192.228.22.11
X-cloud-security-Digest: 5944de303ec83d5f010553088d915e18
X-cloud-security: scantime:2.682
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/EfZHt1yZ5RuV9Bj3-TkKZvDKHCo>
Subject: Re: [Dance] [EXT] Re: call for adoption for
X-BeenThere: dance@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE Authentication for Network Clients Everywhere <dance.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dance/>
List-Post: <mailto:dance@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance>, <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 18:47:49 -0000

Just re-read and I am in favour of adoption, willing to help with reviews.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dance <dance-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Paul Wouters
Sent: February 27, 2022 9:05 PM
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dance@ietf.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [Dance] call for adoption for

On Thu, 24 Feb 2022, Wes Hardaker wrote:

> During IETF 112 the DANCE participants indicated 
> draft-huque-tls-dane-clientid was potentially ready for adoption.  I 
> started a 3-week call for adoption today, ending just before IETF 113.

I am in favour of adoption.

> We'd like to hear support for those in favor of adoption, and whether 
> you'll commit to participating in discussions about it and helping 
> review the document.

Willing to help with reviews.


> A possible reason to not
> adopt this document in DANCE is that you believe it should belong in 
> TLS instead.  Please indicate your preference if you respond to this call.

The TLS WG in general seems to not really care about DANE related TLS things, so I think DANCE is the better of the two. But I'm okay with either.

Paul

--
Dance mailing list
Dance@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email