Re: [Dance] some thoughts/questions from IETF113 meeting (recording)

[Wes Hardaker <[e-mail]>]

Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> writes:

Greetings Michael,

Sorry for the delay (it was a crazy week).

> About the discussion about the use-case document.
[...]
> I did not yet see an adoption call?

Nope, you're absolutely right.  The current version (-01) is now
expired, however.  So to the authors: if you publish a -02 we'll start
the call for adoption shortly thereafter.

> I'm fine with 1hr slot in the future, but I also suggest that a higher
> cadence via monthly virtual interim meetings would be helpful.

I think the chairs would be more than happy to hold interims if they
would be productive.  In order to have a meeting and discussions, it's
important we have discussion topics.  So to all dancers: what topics
from the documents do you believe needs further discussion and warrants
enough (virtual) face-to-face time?  The discussion on the list, as we
pointed out in the meeting, has not been very active.  An interim could
help spur discussion, but before we hold one we need agenda items.  So
to the proponents and editors: what do you need additional community
advice about?  And to the readers: what parts of the documents do you
feel needs the most work and have opinions about that you wish to share.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI