IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension (fwd)

John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> Thu, 05 April 2018 06:43 UTC

Return-Path: <gnu@toad.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0117712426E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EyOsGJOZwXu for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from new.toad.com (new.toad.com [209.237.225.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3BFB120725 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from new.toad.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by new.toad.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id w356hjah006492; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 23:43:45 -0700
Message-Id: <201804050643.w356hjah006492@new.toad.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1804041749370.14534@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1804041749370.14534@bofh.nohats.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> message dated "Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:49:54 -0400."
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 23:43:45 -0700
From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/3uLbBm6PJ4xh0ZaMd36qKWBERpk>
Subject: Re: [dane] [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension (fwd)
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2018 06:43:52 -0000

> FYI,

Looks from this distance like the usual obstruction, i.e. "just give
us a few more years of CA revenues, by delaying this standard further
by demanding to add stuff that could easily have been added by a
followup RFC".

	John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email