IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Tue, 10 April 2018 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B1612D95E for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2W-VocQierR for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F311412D95D for <dane@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C842B7A3309; Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Reply-To: TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:14:06 -0400
Message-Id: <5DB72CA0-4AF0-4A23-A19F-9354416272C2@dukhovni.org>
Cc: dane-users@sys4.de
To: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/TMIrf_n2jqC0dZqYfR2YWcVavMc>
Subject: Re: [dane] [TLS] Consensus Call on draft-ietf-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 15:14:11 -0000

Please read the TLS WG consensus call thread on the DNSSEC chain extension,
and comment for either publish as-is or the changes I and others are advocating
(which IMHO are needed for plausible utility in the web space).

Thread:

	https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/threads.html#25929

Rationale for change:

	https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg25936.html

Why proposed pinning TTL is analogous to STS and not HPKP:

	https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg25956.html

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email