Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard

manning <bmanning@karoshi.com> Thu, 10 September 2015 17:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8961B377E; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.209
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Do2fgywtd48s; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE921A1AB5; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48577BC168D; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at karoshi.com
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vacation.karoshi.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yq9ZYusAg8Ci; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.32.4.206] (unknown [198.32.4.206]) by vacation.karoshi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2C2FBC1683; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning <bmanning@karoshi.com>
In-Reply-To: <87613iyy7c.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:39:40 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <84E13393-79F4-4930-A418-263F1002E56B@karoshi.com>
References: <20150828151107.2592.98917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <87613iyy7c.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
To: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/45YQl0qfZR20B_Pkh3Zaf4kZCtg>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> (Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:41:01 -0000

I’d have to agree with Simon here.  


manning
bmanning@karoshi.com
PO Box 6151
Playa del Rey, CA 90296
310.322.8102






On 10September2015Thursday, at 10:35, Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> wrote:

> I believe it would be a mistake to publish this document without having
> it include a discussion of its relationship to RFC 4648.  As far as I
> can tell, the CERT record defined in RFC 4648 solves roughly the same
> problem as OPENPGPKEY and CERT is already deployed with support in (for
> example) GnuPG.  I believe the community would benefit from sorting out
> the relationship before publication, not after, when we would have two
> RFCs describing solutions for what appears to be the same problem.
> 
> /Simon
> 
> The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> writes:
> 
>> The IESG has received a request from the DNS-based Authentication of
>> Named Entities WG (dane) to consider the following document:
>> - 'Using DANE to Associate OpenPGP public keys with email addresses'
>>  <draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-05.txt> as Proposed Standard
>> 
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2015-09-11. Exceptionally, comments may be
>> sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
>> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>> 
>> Abstract
>> 
>> 
>>   OpenPGP is a message format for email (and file) encryption that
>>   lacks a standardized lookup mechanism to securely obtain OpenPGP
>>   public keys.  This document specifies a method for publishing and
>>   locating OpenPGP public keys in DNS for a specific email address
>>   using a new OPENPGPKEY DNS Resource Record.  Security is provided via
>>   DNSSEC.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The file can be obtained via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/
>> 
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/ballot/
>> 
>> 
>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>> 
>> 
>>