Re: [dane] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <> Sun, 19 January 2014 08:39 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940621AC404; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:39:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.137
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.137 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QE-8s6JCaZih; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6831A1F7B; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 00:39:33 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,684,1384318800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="39547489"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP; 19 Jan 2014 03:39:18 -0500
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 19 Jan 2014 03:29:21 -0500
Received: from ([fe80::6db7:b0af:8480:c126]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:39:15 +0100
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <>
To: Olafur Gudmundsson <>
Thread-Topic: [dane] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
Thread-Index: AQHPEvv5AiogVuwlM0a8So6zPE/EZZqLvbyw
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:39:14 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA243D0ED9AZFFEXMB04globa_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [dane] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:39:36 -0000

Looks good, thank you for addressing my comments.



From: Olafur Gudmundsson []
Sent: יום ה 16 ינואר 2014 22:46
To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Subject: Re: [dane] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:11 AM, "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <<>> wrote:

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at


Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 1/15/2014
IETF LC End Date: 1/23/2014
IESG Telechat date:

Ready with issues

Major issues:
None – it’s a simple, clear and useful document.


Minor issues:
1.       In Section 2.3 the I-D recommends that the values in reference column for SHA-256 and SHA-512 refer to [RFC 6698] while the IANA Considerations section in RFC 6698 recommends and the registry entries in the TLSA Matching Types table at  point to [RFC 6234].

Good Catch, fixed

2.       As this I-D updates the registries with a column for acronyms, it seems more accurate that the reference columns of all tables mention both  [RFC 6698] and [RFC XXXX] (this RFC)

I'm not sure if I agree, all this document does is to change the format of the registries it is not the definitions of any table entry.
But I think it would be good to change the reference for each of the registries to point to both RFC6698 and RFCXXXX

I propose adding to each registry sections the following text:
        "Update reference for this registry to include both [RFC6698] and [RFC-this-document]"

Nits/editorial comments:
In the Introduction section:

‘This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA
   record to add a column with acronym for each specified field’
s/acronym/an acronym/