[dane] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at



<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.



Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.



Document: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dane-registry-acronyms-03.txt

Reviewer: Dan Romascanu

Review Date: 1/15/2014

IETF LC End Date: 1/23/2014

IESG Telechat date:



Summary:

Ready with issues



Major issues:

None - it's a simple, clear and useful document.



Minor issues:

1.       In Section 2.3 the I-D recommends that the values in reference column for SHA-256 and SHA-512 refer to [RFC 6698] while the IANA Considerations section in RFC 6698 recommends and the registry entries in the TLSA Matching Types table at http://www.iana.org/assignments/dane-parameters/dane-parameters.xhtml  point to [RFC 6234].

2.       As this I-D updates the registries with a column for acronyms, it seems more accurate that the reference columns of all tables mention both  [RFC 6698] and [RFC XXXX] (this RFC)



Nits/editorial comments:

In the Introduction section:

'This document updates the IANA registry definition for TLSA

   record to add a column with acronym for each specified field'

s/acronym/an acronym/