IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Summary of second WGLC for dane-smime

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 30 November 2016 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587A612951F for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:22:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4OA1Az-RopUG for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6430512987B for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:22:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3tTN0r2h3dz3Wp; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:36 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1480515756; bh=HnMsIrMDVjkoA8HI8p/xXam9PSu9JztsmMSNFCnvtLo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=jMe02yQv3nzQ2osB/5Co+uis6/rdrq+vWVenJqYNxxFZpgfhmtKYf/03GzwtDD1hb MEw9NWKvG+LRzLPMtp+KWXkSVaScFXudVEaTSmY7xWaQkP7h370ssn29uOqbu9qyCD h/92uQXSPPLzM2quwbkzrLxnR2pmAQJ1KF624cuI=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtEO2SdnUKyO; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:22:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 70A5B31ED97; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:22:32 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca 70A5B31ED97
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECCB40DAA3C; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:22:32 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:22:32 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C0D7E57-C931-4D3E-B6E6-F9EA1F941773@vpnc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1611300921550.14355@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <4C217351-FA2A-4B28-9D17-652FF36D3528@ogud.com> <4C0D7E57-C931-4D3E-B6E6-F9EA1F941773@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/NwzYQSmfs_pFR4D5qrK_yi7CE1Y>
Cc: dane WG list <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] Summary of second WGLC for dane-smime
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:22:41 -0000

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016, Paul Hoffman wrote:

>>  Paul Wouters: pointed out few minor textual issues ==>fix
>
> Fixed.

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dane-smime-13

 	Couldn't retrieve file 2 (http://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dane-smime-13.txt) - please check the URL..

Seems like the diff tools are borken?

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email