Re: [dane] Payment association records
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Fri, 13 March 2015 01:01 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DCE1AC3F3 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xo4tKZtwKLvV for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [149.20.64.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF30E1AC3FD for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:01:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD4F349398; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:01:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE07016006A; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-175-41.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.175.41]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F9EA160069; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58142B4D235; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:01:08 +1100 (EST)
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20150312210723.16146.qmail@ary.lan>
In-reply-to: Your message of "12 Mar 2015 21:07:23 -0000." <20150312210723.16146.qmail@ary.lan>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 12:01:07 +1100
Message-Id: <20150313010108.A58142B4D235@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/YhikCwUAWa6jSS6L8wWMKKOuc4k>
Cc: dane@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dane] Payment association records
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 01:01:05 -0000
In message <2015031221>0723.16146.qmail@ary.lan>, "John Levine" writes: > Concretely, I have a few nits. All the other strings I can think of > in DNS records have one-byte lengths, so I'm wondering if you actually > expect URI strings to be more than 255 bytes. Given the record format has 16 bits for the length field I think the answer is yes. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Payment Network Selector | Preference | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | URI String Length | URI String / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ / / / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Association Data Type | Payment Association Data / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ / / / +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Payment association records John R Levine
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Falcon Darkstar Momot
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Payment association records John Levine
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Mark Andrews
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Payment association records Wiley, Glen
- Re: [dane] Payment association records John R Levine