IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dane] Meeting in Hawaii?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 03 October 2014 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6EF1ACFB7 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bl3KQLHVQ5Jy for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 529B61A884C for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 18:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B0320012 for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:07:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 98FB863AED; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A83363AEC for <dane@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:02:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: dane@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20141002233017.GQ13254@mournblade.imrryr.org>
References: <CAHw9_iLV1uWX2Fg5H9dBaMr=DsrGmyB_BJteP-kBA0MnXCkJ2w@mail.gmail.com> <E36D8CE6-F5E8-4606-950D-430FEAEA3523@kirei.se> <4C36FDC5-12D2-48C1-A3D5-7AA4090E98C8@isoc.org> <20141002233017.GQ13254@mournblade.imrryr.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 21:02:05 -0400
Message-ID: <21940.1412298125@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/v7uIjlxbYW43Fu7NJBtRNeEb2ek
Subject: Re: [dane] Meeting in Hawaii?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 01:02:07 -0000

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
    > It seems that DNSSEC deployment *is* by far the main obstacle.
    > Registrars need to support DS RRs and ideally be able to host DNSSEC
    > domains.  Unlike registries looking after one or a handful of
    > domains, registrars host thousands to millions of domains.  One of
    > the issues raised at the DENIC meeting, is that DNSSEC-capable
    > nameserver software that scales well to very large zone counts is
    > by no means abundant.  Reportedly only PowerDNS comes close, and
    > at least some registrars are reluctant to put all the eggs in one
    > basket and rely on just a single software platform.

Is it a question of the signing infrastructure, or the publication
infrastructure?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email