Re: [Danish] Revised charter based on recent discussions

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 21 July 2021 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: danish@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D5F3A2759 for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Du11JbFVnPi9 for <danish@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E884B3A2758 for <danish@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 13:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0E8300C19 for <danish@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:01:04 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ghiYRIXWgN8w for <danish@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72F94300232; Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:01:01 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ybl35s7fni9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 16:01:00 -0400
Cc: danish@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DAF47545-BA92-49F6-ADC6-92F33BF56E03@vigilsec.com>
References: <yblmtqjntzh.fsf@wx.hardakers.net> <D019C892-5DA0-4ED0-AF29-85685D601F12@vigilsec.com> <ybl35s7fni9.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/danish/AJTb5AdNMyVDWETYAf9DXDVOOk4>
Subject: Re: [Danish] Revised charter based on recent discussions
X-BeenThere: danish@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE AutheNtication for Iot Service Hardening <danish.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/danish/>
List-Post: <mailto:danish@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/danish>, <mailto:danish-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 20:01:11 -0000

>> in the Deliverables:
> 
>> I think it is pretty clear what goes in two of the documents, but the
>> previous sections do not really say what will land in the architecture
>> document.
> 
> That is true.  Do you feel like more specification needs to be made in
> order for the charter to be usable? 

It only matters it things become contentions.  In that situation, clarity about what is in scope and what is not are very useful to the WG Chairs.

Russ